This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

FX-6300 and R7 260x

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. FX-6300 and R7 260x
1 year ago#21
iiFroZenHeAveNz posted...
Me? Bias? No. If I could I would upgrade to the 4770k or the 4790k. THAT is the better bang for my buck. However I don't have that luxury.

Here's another source favoring your Intel i5-2XXX you listed before.
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-2500K-vs-AMD-FX-8350


Once again, you're not posting any benchmarks. We're talking about performance, idk wtf you're talking about.

As I said even i3s beat out the FX-8350, so why are you comparing it to the price of an i5-2500k? Especially since the 2500k is an old processor and you should be looking at the i5-4670k which performs better than the 2500k and is only $239.

4670k = $239 > 2500k = $309 > FX 8350 = $229(unless it's on sale)

Your bias is showing. How bout you bring up that intel processors also go on sale, that would destroy your argument wouldn't it?

ALSO, LOLZ @ saying tomshardware isn't reliable then bringing up CPUBOSS.

Resorting to calling me boy, because you can't prove me wrong. Once again my 5 year old intel CPU beats out any AMD CPU.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
#22
(message deleted)
#23
(message deleted)
1 year ago#24
I'm going to stop here.

You're just wrong dude.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
1 year ago#25
You realize that Sandy Bridge processors are no longer in production, and are therefore more expensive than their Ivy Bridge counterparts, right?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116504
---
7.3 GHz Intel i9 7770k "Hollow Tree" / 64GB TDR4 RAM / GTX Titan 5 GK330 "Daghlian" Chipset, Dodeca-SLI
1 year ago#26
Clouddx posted...
I'm going to stop here.

You're just wrong dude.


You're sad because I proved you wrong? You need a little pacifier to go with that walk of shame of yours? Get blasted, boy.
---
AMD FX-8350 4.0Ghz | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 | 8GB G.Skill Ares DDR3-1600 | EVGA 770 2GB SC ACX | 1TB WD Blue Caviar | CM HAF 912 |
1 year ago#27
iiFroZenHeAveNz posted...
Clouddx posted...
I'm going to stop here.

You're just wrong dude.


You're sad because I proved you wrong? You need a little pacifier to go with that walk of shame of yours? Get blasted, boy.


No I'm stopping because you have no evidence to prove me wrong and started resorting to insults a long time ago. Kiddo. Little boy, dumb.

Every CPU bound game performs better on intel CPUs, that's a fact. The fact is you're bias leads you to believe you're right; you're not. I have two computers, one with my 920 and one with a 750k. I have no problem recommending AMD cpus when they're suited for a build, but to say they perform just as well or better than intel CPUs is asinine.

Monkeymage posted...
You realize that Sandy Bridge processors are no longer in production, and are therefore more expensive than their Ivy Bridge counterparts, right?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116504


He obviously doesn't have much knowledge about CPUs, that's quite evident at this point.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
1 year ago#28
This whole exchange above made me think of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqQ62B8xdJc
---
-What is best in life?
-To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women.
1 year ago#29
Shub posted...
This whole exchange above made me think of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqQ62B8xdJc


LOL, =D

IDK, Shub you prob have more knowledge than me about CPUs. Are the benchmarks that I posted wrong in showing Intel CPUs performing better in games like Civ 5 and GW2?
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
1 year ago#30
Clouddx posted...
Shub posted...
This whole exchange above made me think of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqQ62B8xdJc


LOL, =D

IDK, Shub you prob have more knowledge than me about CPUs. Are the benchmarks that I posted wrong in showing Intel CPUs performing better in games like Civ 5 and GW2?


No you're not wrong. Its in benchmarks EVERYWHERE. Surely EVERY site that does benchmarks shows that Intel is better for gamin over AMD. They can't all be wrong...? .........Right?
---
We're Americans! We don't quit just because we're wrong.
We just keep doing the wrong thing until it turns out right.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. FX-6300 and R7 260x

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived