This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Do ultra and high graphics even matter?

#41ClouddxPosted 7/22/2014 9:20:39 PM(edited)
Maximoom posted...
Clouddx posted...
Maximoom posted...
something wrong on his computer.


I guess something is wrong with this guys computer as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJKU74uxyHg (1080p and he says 30fps at average)

ohh and this guys

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQv0TdDd5k0 (no details)

and this guys as well?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra_noECbD54 (using a q6600, I had a i5 and 8gb ram)

Every single person that benchmarked with that card reports the same thing, expect for you. Nothing is wrong with their systems you're just lying thru your teeth.


Dude, you're wrong.

http://www.techspot.com/review/603-best-graphics-cards/page10.html

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti struggled at 1680x1050 when running the Sleeping Dogs benchmark, with an average of just 21fps.



The 650 Ti is also significantly stronger than the GTS 250, and still can't pull off more than 21 FPS on max settings sans AA @ 1680x1050. There's even The Witcher 2 benchmarks in there, and also Skyrim benchmarks that show you're not hitting anywhere close to 60FPS with that card.

A 7970ghz doesn't even hit 60FPS in the game at those settings, once again you're lying. IDK why, but you are.

I guess something must be wrong with their computers as well right?
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
#42animanganimePosted 7/22/2014 9:19:35 PM
Quote:Anti-Aliasing= Useless at 1080p.
@soccerj75

Only if your screen is like 5"
---
WC i5 2500k @ 4.4 ghz, 2x GTX 670 DirectCU II, Samsung 830 128GB SSD, 16GB G.Skill 1600 DDR3, Zalman 1000W PSU, Cosmos 1000 Case, HP LP3065 @ 2560 x 1600 IPS
#43LvthnPosted 7/22/2014 9:23:03 PM
Maximoom posted...
something wrong on his computer.

When I played sleepings dogs I already had the i5. 1600x900, texture pack and keep in the 45-50.

The first game that played at low 30's for me was just cause 2. That was the reason I upgrade to the 760.


You never even measured framerate, you're pulling these numbers straight from your ass. You aren't the first person to claim to own a GPU made by the hand of god that gets double the benchmark and you won't be the last to claim you no longer own it or are unwilling to set it up to prove your completely unrealistic claim.

I don't know what made you even think to waste your time, benchmarks are widely available and computers operate on precise specifications. It's not something with a bunch of wiggle room and wild variances in performance.
#44MaximoomPosted 7/22/2014 9:35:01 PM(edited)
These benchmarks doesnt make sense, the game was extremelly fluid.

Tomorrow I will talk to the guy I sold the card and try to get some prints with fps.
---
Asus P8H61-MLE/BR | i5 3470 3.2Ghz | Zotac GTX 760 2GB | 8GB DDR3-1333 | 1TB HDD | C3TEC 500Rve 500W Bronze | Samsung 32" LCD 1080p.
#45ClouddxPosted 7/22/2014 9:34:57 PM(edited)
Maximoom posted...
These benchmarks doesnt make sense, the game was extremelly fluid.


Yep, the benchmarks are wrong not you... Every single benchmark from every single source is wrong, and you're correct.

I believe the word for this, and no offense is delusional.

Serious face-palming right now.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
#46MaximoomPosted 7/22/2014 9:48:18 PM
I think I understand why these numbers (for sleeping dogs) are soo different from the ones I was getting with the GTS 250!!!

These benchmarks mention DIRECTX 11. GTS 250 only support up to directx 10.

Could it be it?
---
Asus P8H61-MLE/BR | i5 3470 3.2Ghz | Zotac GTX 760 2GB | 8GB DDR3-1333 | 1TB HDD | C3TEC 500Rve 500W Bronze | Samsung 32" LCD 1080p.
#47ClouddxPosted 7/22/2014 9:49:48 PM
Maximoom posted...
I think I understand why these numbers (for sleeping dogs) are soo different from the ones I was getting with the GTS 250!!!

These benchmarks mention DIRECTX 11. GTS 250 only support up to directx 10.

Could it be it?


No, DX11 is more efficient than DX10 and would provide better performance.

Plus TW2 is only DX9.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
#48MaximoomPosted 7/22/2014 9:51:49 PM
But the numbers for witcher 2 are close to what I said.

The ones for sleeping dogs not.
---
Asus P8H61-MLE/BR | i5 3470 3.2Ghz | Zotac GTX 760 2GB | 8GB DDR3-1333 | 1TB HDD | C3TEC 500Rve 500W Bronze | Samsung 32" LCD 1080p.
#49ClouddxPosted 7/22/2014 9:55:02 PM(edited)
Maximoom posted...
But the numbers for witcher 2 are close to what I said.

The ones for sleeping dogs not.


NO they're not. That's on a 650 ti which is SIGNIFICANTLY more powerful than a GTS 250. at least 150% more powerful. The 650 Ti = a 470 GTX. The GTS 250 = HD7730.
---
i7-920 @ 3.6 // 770 GTX // 12 GB G.Skill Sniper Ram // PS3 // 360
FiiO e9+17 // AD700 + M50 // Deck Legend + 82 // DAS Ultimate S
#50MaximoomPosted 7/22/2014 9:54:41 PM
http://www.hwcompare.com/13718/geforce-gts-250-1gb-vs-geforce-gtx-650-ti/

650 ti is around 26% better.

And these benchmarks are at 1680x1050 which is around 25% more pixels then 1600x900.
---
Asus P8H61-MLE/BR | i5 3470 3.2Ghz | Zotac GTX 760 2GB | 8GB DDR3-1333 | 1TB HDD | C3TEC 500Rve 500W Bronze | Samsung 32" LCD 1080p.