so something like crysis shouldn't really count since you could still play it with decent hardware for the time even if it looked like ass.
depending on how great a game like DR3 supposedly looks, i'm not even supposed to be able to boot it up with my 7850 which is just... ugh. --- PC hardware doesn't need to match console hardware in price when PC gamers save literal thousands from the software they buy. http://i.imgur.com/9Yv0R2Z.jpg
If there is none. Them how cam you say that the requirements in the other games are not justified. Clearly, no one is doing a better job. Does that not justify it in itself ? --- I5 3570 | GTX 760 | Kingston V300 120 GB | Corsair VX550 | Asus Xonar DGX | Corsair 300r | AKG k550 | Realforce 87U | Zowie EC1 Evo White
obviously there should be some criteria you can judge from like resolution, fps, texture quality etc. when comparing it to other games.
like if i can run metro on high with at least 30fps in 1080p, then why shouldn't i be able to start up DR3(don't know if i can obv) in 720p on low with 30fps? unless of course it just looks that good even with those settings. --- PC hardware doesn't need to match console hardware in price when PC gamers save literal thousands from the software they buy. http://i.imgur.com/9Yv0R2Z.jpg
It might be ASCII, which would lead you to believe that it would require next to no resources but because it has to calculate so many things simultaneously... --- The man keeps us down because he likes to see us frown