This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Obama just mentioned violent video games

#451SheepinatorPosted 1/18/2013 6:11:15 PM
TheBlueStig posted...
Sheepinator posted...
You do realize the Third Reich had tanks and fighter planes?

Vintage tanks like Tigers and Panzers can be disabled and become 60 ton roadblocks with an IED or a Lahti 20mm anti-tank rifle to the tracks. It was their biggest weakness besides the amount of fuel they sucked down so attacking the supply lines was always a viable option.

Planes can be disabled by sabotage on the ground (especially at night), or back then, by small arms fire to the engine block (or pilot) when they came in for a low pass, and as always, they can't fly without fuel.

Every obstacle comes with a way to defeat it, always has, always will.

How will you take down the drones when they come for you?

Serious question, how many years supply of canned foods and rice do you have stored right now?
---
My mad face and my happy face are the same.
#452WinternovaPosted 1/18/2013 6:11:20 PM
TheBlueStig posted...
Sheepinator posted...
Literacy is banned too.

Actually it was in Cambodia, educated people slaughtered, even people who just looked like they were educated were executed.


You'd have been safe.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKUUUvjjzo
Fan of: Steelers(6-time Champions), Red Wings(11-time Champions)
#453all_that_juicePosted 1/18/2013 6:18:03 PM
Breasts can kill people. Should we ban those too?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/16/donna-lange-breasts-smother-kill-boyfriend-everett-washington_n_2486189.html
---
isn't hearing technically a dimension? so this should be called the 4DS. - I_Always_Die
#454WinternovaPosted 1/18/2013 6:24:33 PM
all_that_juice posted...
Breasts can kill people. Should we ban those too?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/16/donna-lange-breasts-smother-kill-boyfriend-everett-washington_n_2486189.html


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57409856-504083/mom-accused-of-killing-peanut-allergic-daughter-by-feeding-her-m-ms/

M&Ms can kill people. We should ban M&Ms.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKUUUvjjzo
Fan of: Steelers(6-time Champions), Red Wings(11-time Champions)
#455vigorm0rtisPosted 1/18/2013 6:26:15 PM
Winternova posted...
all_that_juice posted...
Breasts can kill people. Should we ban those too?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/16/donna-lange-breasts-smother-kill-boyfriend-everett-washington_n_2486189.html


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57409856-504083/mom-accused-of-killing-peanut-allergic-daughter-by-feeding-her-m-ms/

M&Ms can kill people. We should ban M&Ms.


Dogs in cars can kill people. We should... wait...

http://gawker.com/5976817/dog-runs-down-man-boxer-bulldog-kills-owner-with-family-car
---
"'Grab the guns!' 'What about the troll?' 'Leave the troll.'"--ATHF
#456shawnmckPosted 1/18/2013 6:59:39 PM
Winternova posted...
shawnmck posted...
And when are you Libs going to get it that the US is NOT Switzerland...NOT Europe....NOT the UK.....NOT anywhere else.
Those Countries do NOT have a Constitution granting them Rights.


http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/1/101.en.pdf

Title 2 delineates the rights Swiss citizens have. Hell, they have a lot more than we do, including this one:

Art. 12 Right to assistance when in need
Persons in need and unable to provide for themselves have the right to assistance and care, and to the financial means required for a decent standard of living.


Imagine if we tried to pass a Constitutional Amendment like this...the current GOP would be in an uproar. I think THIS sort of right is infinitely more important than gun ownership, but you'll never see widespread support for a right that helps other people, just the ones that allow weapons in the hands of individuals. Kinda sad, really.

http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/GG.htm

Germany's Constitution's first chapter is all about the rights of citizens.

Do you REALLY believe that the United States is the only country in the world that has a Constitution that grants people rights?


^ I never said that other Countries don't have documents that grant their citizens Rights, what I said is that such documents of other Countries are NOT the same as those of the United States, and people like you need to STOP acting that they are or that they need to be exactly like they are in other Countries.
You're always saying that the United States needs to be like this Country, or that Country, or that we need to adopt the same laws & regulations.
That is just idiotic thinking.

And you even support this by claiming that the GOP would "be in an uproar" if we did...so you recognize that while other Countries have their own Rights, they are still DIFFERENT than that of the US.

So your whole argument or implication that just because other Countries have gun bans that the United States needs to have gun bans too is totally illogical and foolish.
It's like saying Germany bans violent games and depictions of blood...so that the US should do the same.
Its NOT relevant, and the US should NOT copy other Countries, just because it somehow mimics what you want.
#457WinternovaPosted 1/18/2013 7:47:18 PM
shawnmck posted...
^ I never said that other Countries don't have documents that grant their citizens Rights


shawnmck posted...
Those Countries do NOT have a Constitution granting them Rights.


Yes, you did say that.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMKUUUvjjzo
Fan of: Steelers(6-time Champions), Red Wings(11-time Champions)
#458vigorm0rtisPosted 1/18/2013 8:49:16 PM
Winternova posted...
shawnmck posted...
^ I never said that other Countries don't have documents that grant their citizens Rights


shawnmck posted...
Those Countries do NOT have a Constitution granting them Rights.


Yes, you did say that.


Keep track of your argument when you tangle with the lawyer. Just sayin'.

Actually, you should probably keep the whole thing straight in your head as a matter of practice.
---
"'Grab the guns!' 'What about the troll?' 'Leave the troll.'"--ATHF
#459RagnoraokPosted 1/18/2013 9:35:16 PM
reverence27 posted...
TheBlueStig posted...
Patchwork posted...
You're overreacting.


Look into what Bloomberg and Feinstein have already done, and are proposing for the future, and the hypocrisy of them owning and CARRYING guns on a daily basis, and tell me I'm over-reacting.

Anti-gun politicians that are armed themselves and have armed bodyguards refuse to allow people to defend themselves.

Hypocrisy Much ? ? ?


Please explain the Hypocrisy? Did they outlaw guns, And for Anti Gun Politicians that have armed bodyguards, 1. they are high profile risks who must be protected from people like you that would take their conspiracy theories to the extreme and wish harm on them and at risk to act on this mental breakdow, and 2. Citizens are more than welcome to hire professional highly trained armed bodyguards for protection, no one is trying to take that away?
3. most of these antigun politicians are not looking to ban all firearms, they just feel that the there should be more regulation. You can't own a tank, a rocket launcher, a nuclear missle, what would you need it for other than killing.


but that is where it starts. First they take away the high profile ones, then make their way to shotguns, then semi-automatic handguns, then regular hand guns. They dont even need to go that far, since the authorities will have high velocity assault rifles to stop any other weapon. I do not see the point of America focusing on gun control on LEGAL guns, when illegal ppl are the ones abusing it. It is clearly an attempt to disarm and take away power from all Americans. I dont even know why I bother. Noone here cares, and will only ridicule me and call me a conspiracy nut. Oh well, lets see how free we really are in a century.....
---
Here at gamefaqs, you are either a troll, noob, or fanboy.....choose wisely.
#460SheepinatorPosted 1/18/2013 9:46:43 PM
Ragnoraok posted...
but that is where it starts. First they take away the high profile ones, then make their way to shotguns, then semi-automatic handguns, then regular hand guns. They dont even need to go that far, since the authorities will have high velocity assault rifles to stop any other weapon. I do not see the point of America focusing on gun control on LEGAL guns, when illegal ppl are the ones abusing it. It is clearly an attempt to disarm and take away power from all Americans. I dont even know why I bother. Noone here cares, and will only ridicule me and call me a conspiracy nut. Oh well, lets see how free we really are in a century.....

Yeah the evidence for this is in the continued loosening of gun laws in recent years, just lulling the paranoid folk into lowering their guard...

The Founders obviously got everything right and planned ahead for perpetuity. And look what has happened to other things since then because of the slipperly slope. Blacks are now 5/5ths, and women can vote! What's next, a black President or a woman President? They must be turning over in their graves.
---
My mad face and my happy face are the same.