This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Do you notice the difference between 30fps and 60fps in a Video Game?

#151huntmaster17Posted 1/21/2013 1:53:46 PM
http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html
---
Steam/PSN: SluggaJay
#152NewShirePosted 1/21/2013 1:57:01 PM
Bioshock 2, Far Cry 3, and Need for Speed: Most Wanted (2012) are three xbox360 games that first come to mind when thinking of games with particularly bad framerates.

IMO the framerate of those games affected gameplay in a consistently noticeable and negative way.

60fps is always better than 30fps, but if the framerate is locked at 30 and stable throughout the entire game (like in DmC for instance,) it's not a big deal at all.

While I believe that a lot of people on this board are over exaggerating about the difference 60fps makes, I still sincerely hope next gen consoles require games to be locked at 60fps. Although I really doubt that'll happen.
---
Taste the torture that I endure!
#153pothocketPosted 1/21/2013 1:57:08 PM
huntmaster17 posted...
http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html


OMG, is it really that hard to do a side-by-side comparison?
---
well I am not like your dad. I worked as a chef at TGIF-Mattson
#154triple sPosted 1/21/2013 5:44:08 PM
D1Tremere posted...
30 FPS is all you need to present a smooth image, anything more really only serves to keep the minimum framerate consent.
Movies, for example, are shown at 24 FPS with an uncomfortable to some surreal quality reported for higher frame rate tests...


*Rolls eyes*

I can't believe some of the comments I see here. Again, I'm sure it has to do with not being able to play a lot of games at 60fps.
---
GT:Triple S 06
PSN:Triple_S_09
#155FungumPosted 1/21/2013 5:47:44 PM
D1Tremere posted...
30 FPS is all you need to present a smooth image, anything more really only serves to keep the minimum framerate consent.
Movies, for example, are shown at 24 FPS with an uncomfortable to some surreal quality reported for higher frame rate tests...


No.

And movies use motion blur because they are shot at such low frames per second.

Go learn something.
#156Deathx113Posted 1/21/2013 5:50:20 PM
Fungum posted...
D1Tremere posted...
30 FPS is all you need to present a smooth image, anything more really only serves to keep the minimum framerate consent.
Movies, for example, are shown at 24 FPS with an uncomfortable to some surreal quality reported for higher frame rate tests...


No.

And movies use motion blur because they are shot at such low frames per second.

Go learn something.



Ironing.
---
Mods thinking: "Alright, well I'm going to delete this topic, but first let me delete as many of these posts as I can! HohoMwahahhaha!!"
#157huntmaster17Posted 1/21/2013 7:08:39 PM
pothocket posted...
huntmaster17 posted...
http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html


OMG, is it really that hard to do a side-by-side comparison?


OMG just turn your monitor side ways geez......
---
Steam/PSN: SluggaJay
#158CressetPosted 1/22/2013 2:27:08 PM
Darkside_Shadow posted...
People who do NOT notice the difference should not consider becoming pilots. Or procreate for that matter.


gaming eugenics
---
What's the matter, the Zubats and Geodudes too much for you? Can't get through a cave with just five monsters? How sad. - mikeburnfire
#159MRL3G3NDPosted 1/22/2013 2:30:57 PM
When things are extra smooth it's 60...when things are regular they don't look extra smooth...

I played need for speed then switched over to Forza 4...night and day...

COD and any other shooter night and day

my probalem is why do people make it out to be such a big deal....in cod it feels like I'm gliding flying around BF3 I feel like I am running around
---
The Closest You'll Ever Come to Afghanistan in Gaming...
http://youtu.be/GIhqUiQJt6Q
#160shawnmckPosted 1/22/2013 2:33:39 PM
Yes, the animations are much smoother.

To be honest though, I'd be content with 45 fps.