Does MS still own them and for how long? I think they are using that company in such a wrong way. I can bet my life that if they were with Nintendo we would have gotten a Conker prequel or sequel... And new Banjo and Kazooie game part 3 and a prequel or sequel to perfect Dark...Maybe even anew new Jet Force Gemini.
What do you guys think? I mean look what Nintendo did for Capcom... Viewtiful Joe 1 and 2, Re4, Re0, ReRemake... All awesome sauce. Sure, you can say maybe Capcom would have made those reguardless, but I'm pretty sure if MS told them to do a new Conker they would... But, MS knows nothing about games...
PS 360 is my console of choice, so no bashing O_o.
The people that made Rare what it was are gone, it's time for you to let them go. --- http://www.bewaretherobotsquad.com/p/headcase.html http://i761.photobucket.com/albums/xx259/headwoundss/129167586636177506-1.gif
Rare did some of their best stuff this gen IMO, and I'm hopeful they have something interesting planned for Durango launch/unveiling. MS is more generous/adventuresome at the beginning of generations (well, so far). --- The writing was on the wall with Bioware the minute you could completely void all of your decisions with one choice in KOTOR.
Not all left to Free Radical... Anyways, they are British so they have talent O_o. I liked all there games this gen, but MS needs to push for these games that people want. It would be an amazing launch to have a 3d platformer and a great change of pace from the typical Cod shooter we will see on launch... Do you really want to go another 6 years of this same old crap. Heck Rainbow Six needs to be launched on launch day so it could come pretty big.