I'm basing my shock in the 10's of others on the first point as much, if not more, than the second point. I thought overall that game needed a LOT of improvement.
you mocked others for having a different opinion, I was just saying how a 10/10 to a lot of people does not mean without any faults. I also am one of those that gave it a 10/10.
I’m STILL shocked to find you would give it a 10/10. I’m not mocking the opinion of anyone who felt that the game deserved that score, only that the game seemed to have enough objective flaws that it wouldn’t typically fall into a 10/10 range for a lot of people. That’s my take; if it was 10/10 for anyone, then good for them.
People gave it 10/10 user scores just for the fact it was an above average game & was completely being overlooked by most big name sites & thus would get no chance to sell good.
"gone are the days of creativity, and playing japanese games because you secretly wish you were japanese" -CinisterX
You're completely insane, when someone gives a game a perfect 10, they DO mean the game doesn't have any faults.
So if the game DOES have faults then it does NOT deserve a perfect score.
Do you get it yet?
No, he was right. If that were the case for a 10/10, the score would have never been achieved, as there is literally no such thing as a game without any faults. What a 10/10 is generally regarded as, is a game whose faults are so few, or so minor in comparison to the enjoyment of the game, that the entertainment value you receive from the game is "perfect."