This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.
Things that are worse than...Dragon Age 2?
SAGETISMYSAVIOR posted...656stooge posted...SAGETISMYSAVIOR posted...And here I was thinking people would be against me, not with me. :)
King's Field is much much much slower, combat is not as deep, monsters are not as big or varied. It is very difficult, although some of that difficulty is kinda cheap (there are insta-deaths all over the place, some as soon as 5 mins in).
See the Turtle of enormous girth, on his shell he holds the Earth.
Yes Superman 64 was bad, but Superman 64 was like getting stabbed in the face. You were sort of expecting it was going to suck.
Dragon Age II was better than Dragon Age:Origins.
Fan of: Steelers(6-time Champions), Red Wings(11-time Champions)
Going to my local comic store on Friday nights to play some Magic: The Gathering. And some guy there brings his kid and makes her sit in the corner and do homework while he plays.
Everyday's great at your Junes!
Final Fantasy VIII.
And people that tailgate you on the freeway, then just hang in your blind spot when you try to let them pass, resulting in you either getting stuck behind a ****ing semi, or flooring it to get back in front of them before reaching said slow-ass semi. The latter causes them to become filled with an idiotic rage, as they are always completely oblivious to how annoying they were being, often because they were on their damn phones.
And ground-nesting bees that attack you when you mow the lawn.
But mostly, that guy. FFVIII was great.
*disappears into forest*
Holy crap. People are actually defending that atrocity of a game? DA2 was absolutely terrible. Let's go through the ways.
1. Your choices don't do anything. Whichever faction you side with, things for the world pretty much end up the same. You make no difference aside from the lives of a few of some supporting characters. In DAO, you got to decide who the ruling monarch was of not one but TWO kingdoms. In DA2, you get to decide... I have no idea how to finish that sentence.
2. Even the choices they do present are often not choices at all. "But thou must!", I believe these are called. Example.
3. They even take back choices you made previously in DAO! Did you know that you kill Leliana, Anders, and Justice? They just pop back up in DA2 anyway. Remember that when someone claims those few choices you do get, about deciding how allies' lives turn out, matters. Because they'll retcon the hell out of it. How about the epilogue slides? Retconned also. Cullen can end up a raving lunatic wandering the countryside murdering random folk. And yet there he is in DA2, because Gaider sure loves to retcon.
4. A critical part of the story is very well hidden. Unless you managed to collect the Enigma of Kirkwall codexes, you don't really understand why Kirkwall seems to be made out of evil. Even if you do, you're left to wonder how an entire city can not notice they're sitting on the portal to Hell.
5. Reused areas and all that... honestly, I don't care much about that. It's a Bioware game. They make--they USED to make games that told a good, deep story and provided the player with lots of choices and paths to follow. This game seemed to actively try to avoid doing either. The story is rehashed drivel about a "righteous" genocide and there's no choice that makes any real differences. It's like an incredibly bad remake of The Witcher. I fully expect Dragon Age 3 to be about stopping a kingslayer who has framed the PC.
... Oh yeah, the original question. What's worse than Dragon Age 2? The ending to Mass Effect 3. God, how I miss the old BioWare. Rest in peace, BW.
Bioware just tried to do what ME2 did which was tone down the RPG elements of the first game and make the gameplay more approachable. It worked for ME2 because the RPG elements kind of didn't fit the setting that well in the first place and the shooting was crap in the first game. Problem was DAO was one of the best games of it's kind in years and didn't require the toning down of it's RPG elements in favor of more action oriented gameplay. They were essentially fixing something that wasn't broken in the first place.
Still even if the gameplay/RPG stuff was better the game was still just a poor rushed sequel that was inferior in almost every way to it's predecessor.
All THAT said it's not even close to as bad as people make it out to be. It's just merely mediocre, not the spawn of Satan's a##hole like people exaggerate.
3570k @ 1.260v - 4.6Ghz, GTX 580 @ 980/2106, ASUS Sabertooth z77, 8GB G.Skill Sniper 1600MHZ, Intel 335 SSD (boot).
Bioshock Infinite's godawful auto-save checkpoint system. Worst. Thing. Ever.
The bulk of the GameFAQ's community
If you have a problem with potheads, throw your computer out the window right now. Why should you be able leech off the creativity of those you condemn?
I actually enjoyed DA2. So a lot worse out there in my opinion. Crimson Alliance and Braid spring to mind.
I haven't played Braid, but it's been praised by pretty much everyone.
"I'm not good at this game" =/= "This game is bad"