the only difference i see in battlefield is that it is more destructive, more land vehicles, diverse class so like being a medic, and bigger maps besides that I don't see any difference
then they say cod is basically the same game over and over again but when is see battlefield it's basically the same game all over again but bad company is just comedic while the battlefield sequel is more serious.
just want to see what makes battlefield so much better then call of duty on xbox 360 so just want to hear your thoughts if it's better, the same, or worse?
(I'm not saying cod is the better just saying I don't understand why battlefield is regarding as the best fps to play then cod)
Is this a joke thread? Battlefield = bigger maps, more realism, destructive environment, more team based and takes much more time. Call of Duty = fast pace, small maps, ridiculously unrealistic, non interactive environment, quick. Either a. this is a joke b. your a die hard RPG player c. you've been living in a cave for the last 6 years --- Xbox GT: WDG DeltazZ