This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Assassins Creed 2 or 3?

#1ggazooPosted 11/19/2012 7:33:49 AM
Trying to decide which one to get - which one is better and why? Should I start with 2 anyway?
#2robert_rangersuPosted 11/19/2012 7:50:46 AM
You should start with one if you never played any of them I'd say. On of the great things about the series is the story, you'll be missing out if you don't do them in order.
Couldn't care less = you don't care one single bit.
Could care less = you do care, at least a little.
#3temgunPosted 11/19/2012 7:52:34 AM
AC2 is better and you should start with that. If you start from AC3, you might as well not play the series at all unless you don't care about the continuous story thought the series at all. Or hell, if you don't care about the story at all.
#4XNo_FearXPosted 11/19/2012 7:55:22 AM
tbh AC2 is a dragfest. It plays out way to long that i couldnt bother to finish it. AC3 is pretty epic throughout though.
PSN ID: Ctx_Ghost
#5true_gamer80Posted 11/19/2012 8:13:25 AM
Easily...easily AC3...AC2 is a solid game but whoever says AC2 is right out of it imo. 3 is so so much improved, so much more to do aswell.
Real Hip Hop...I miss the 90's
#6AzureVergilPosted 11/19/2012 8:21:05 AM
AC2, AC3 has a boring story, boring era and the change in the control is unnecessary and stupid.

I platinumed AC2, Brotherhood & Revelation but loss interest in AC3. I will even say Revelation was more fun than AC3.
#7SonicNashPosted 11/19/2012 8:36:45 AM
AC2. AC3 sucked with a ending almost as bad as ME3's.
Hinata Hyuga:
#8ggazoo(Topic Creator)Posted 11/19/2012 8:48:39 AM
SonicNash posted...
AC2. AC3 sucked with a ending almost as bad as ME3's.

If the ending to AC3 is so bad, should I even bother with 2?