PlayStation 3 » Hardware » Console

PlayStation 3

This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Graphics vs Content

Back To: Board List | Topic List | Topic Archived
Page 1 of 2 | Last
SieKensou
Posted 11/28/2012 8:24:17 AM
What's more Important? - Results (109 votes)
Graphics 100%: Content 0%
5.5%
6
Graphics 90%: Content 10%
0.92%
1
Graphics 75%: Content 25%
0%
0
Graphics 50%: Content 50%
19.27%
21
Graphics 25% Content 75%
27.52%
30
Graphics 10%: Content 90%
7.34%
8
Graphics 0%: Content 100%
6.42%
7
Graphics should develop alongside expansive content but be less important than the content itself
25.69%
28
Content should be expanded alongside graphics but be less important than graphics
0.92%
1
Graphics and Content are equally important and neither should be seen as more than the other
6.42%
7
This poll is now closed.
I believe this gen suffered a lot because developers went with Media as a primary focus and content wasn't even secondary but pushed to the last priority....
---
Tear Grants: Yappari Kawaiii~! <3<3<3
Want/Interested/Recommended Games: http://artonelico.isisview.org/viewtopic.php?p=362462#p362462
este914
Posted 11/28/2012 8:36:10 AM
Graphics should develop alongside expansive content but be less important than the content itself
---
-> este914 <-
WHO ELSE?!
jammies
Posted 11/28/2012 8:43:24 AM
Simply doesn't matter. Good games are good games, regardless.
---
I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book.
Groucho Marx
Evil_Gogeta
Posted 11/28/2012 8:43:58 AM
50/50 imo, but depends on the game a lot of games give you both and a lot of games give more G than C.
---
PSN: GuiltyPersona Official Foreign JoJo no Kimyou na Bouken #1 Fan
Currently Playing: (PS3) JJNKNB HD (PC) Guild Wars 2, The War Z (ARC) Persona 4 Arena
Garr-
Posted 11/28/2012 8:45:06 AM
It doesn't matter if the games have tons of content and good graphics or no content and bad graphics. It can still be good or bad.
lambchips
Posted 11/28/2012 8:47:18 AM
graphics, let modders make the content
---
i7 3820@ 3.60GHz| 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz DDR3| Gigabyte GTX670 2GB OC| Intel 520 Series 120GB SSD| Antec EarthWatts 750W Green
F_Wolf
Posted 11/28/2012 9:26:32 AM

(edited)
Content, because I know the difference between aesthetics and graphics.

Or neither, because there is a difference between content and good content.
Stevo1350
Posted 11/28/2012 9:26:29 AM
Content. Who the hell cares if a game has 3 less picked than the next. 10 years ago it would still be mind blowing.
---
myspace.com/mysticsteven
PSN:ThaBeezKneez
Motsu
Posted 11/28/2012 9:32:02 AM
Graphics 10, content 90. I want alot to do. Graphics mean next to diddly poop to me if there is alot of fun to be had and content. Of course, graphics aren't COMPLETELY useless.
---
Sailor Moon returns 2013! O_o
kel25
Posted 11/28/2012 9:47:36 AM
Graphics 0% and Content 100% Assuming the game is fun no matter what the graphics and content are...

Who cares is a game has the most mind blowing graphics if it only lasts you an hour? I want a long game that gives me a ton of bang for my buck. I really don't care about graphics because I started with the Atari. I grew up with awful graphics and know that they really don't matter.
Jump to Page: 1  2  
Page 1 of 2 | Last