It would be different if the series was still a benchmark in quality. But since ditching the golden rule of "if it isn't broke don't fix it" in the early 2000s each new installment just feels like example of something new that just shouldn't have been done. --- I support Alex Smith #11
And games that shouldn't have any further titles... Dishonored (I love the game, but I don't really want more of this.) Dark Souls (Two is enough, not like they are going to find a miraculous new feature to add.) Assassin's Creed (They did alright, but do we really need to see an Assassin's Creed X?) --- Maybe if we talk to the television, and know everything there is to know about football, that our favorite team will make it to the super bowl...
Ima just say this, people who think FF has too many sequels... I'd love for you to explain how this is. Every game in the MAIN series is a new universe and I look forward to each one.
FF has too many SPINOFFs for sure, but not sequels as far as the main series theres no way.
Lol your name... anyways its the fact that they use the name final fantasy for games that have absolutely no relation to each other that make it a series that needs to stop. People are hating games that are good on its own but because it has the name Final Fantasy in front of it, people are comparing every game to its predecessors and its annoying. Of course BEcause of the name, my interest in the game goes up but Square Enix's name on a game is good enough for my interests.