This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What do you prefer: on-disc DLC or off-disc DLC

#1jammiesPosted 12/10/2012 11:54:07 AM
_________ - Results (172 votes)
On-disc
19.19% (33 votes)
33
Off-disc
80.81% (139 votes)
139
This poll is now closed.

---
I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book.
Groucho Marx
#2jubjub360Posted 12/10/2012 11:57:00 AM
I don't really care. On disc DLC is normally DLC I don't give a s*** about and off DLC is good later on.
---
F*** yo' MLA! It's all about that APA!
http://i.imgur.com/JF8gG.jpg
#3AnonUnknownPosted 12/10/2012 11:58:38 AM
off-disc downloadable expansions, too bad they're pretty much unexisting nowadays.
#4themegaman7Posted 12/10/2012 12:01:38 PM
Both suck equally as much. I want complete games.
---
PSN - Expa0
- The official Doppelganger of SMT IV boards -
#5Pereb27Posted 12/10/2012 12:03:53 PM
Don't really care either, but if I had to choose it would be off-disc.

Take a game that has on-disc DLC.
If there was a scenario where they wouldn't be allowed to do on-disc DLC, they wouldn't have left said content unlocked on the disc, they would have removed it from the disc and release it as download later so they could charge for it anyway... unfortunately.
#6Fear the MONKEYPosted 12/10/2012 12:03:59 PM
on disc....when there is no code that needs to be purschased to "unlock" it (especially day 1)

example: game of the year editions with all dlc on the disc

otherwise, theyre both rip offs
---
psn id: FearTheMonkey
#7sirtonnePosted 12/10/2012 12:04:36 PM
I prefer free DLC, big expansions, or no DLC.

Never once paid for something like extra skins or short scenarios, and never will.
#8jubjub360Posted 12/10/2012 12:04:48 PM
themegaman7 posted...
Both suck equally as much. I want complete games.


So DLC released a year after makes the original game incomplete?
---
F*** yo' MLA! It's all about that APA!
http://i.imgur.com/JF8gG.jpg
#9BlinkWinkelPosted 12/10/2012 12:07:00 PM
Off disc, since at least for off disc DLC you're paying for new stuff and don't feel ripped off as much. For on disc DLC you're paying to access stuff on a disc you paid for and own...
#10Superfly Jo JoPosted 12/10/2012 12:14:29 PM
I miss the days when companies actually released expansion packs for games like they did in the 90s and early 2000s for PC games. They were more often than not developed after the base games initial release, and contained a lot of content that really enhanced the experience. Some examples include Diablo II: Lord of Destruction, Doom 3: Resurrection of Evil, Starcraft: Brood War, GTA: London 1969, all the Quake and Quake 2 mission packs, etc. Now more often than not we get some map or weapon packs that cost $10 - $15 that are either locked on the disc or held back for a later date so they can get more money from our pockets. Some developers still put some thought and care into their expansions, but they're too few and far between.
---
PSN: spacedirtyjerz
Currently Playing: Resident Evil 3: Nemesis, Zelda: OoT, Sonic's Ultimate Genesis Collection, Conker's Bad Fur Day, Doom 3 BFG