PlayStation 3

I'm passing on Dark Souls 2 because those games are boring as hell. They're not as challenging as people make them out to be when you can hide behind a shield or easily roll out of the A.I.'s predictably slow attacks.

I'll stick to real WRPG's that are actually good.

8f9g43k8ku7335p posted...

I'm passing on Dark Souls 2 because those games are boring as hell. They're not as challenging as people make them out to be when you can hide behind a shield or easily roll out of the A.I.'s predictably slow attacks.

I'll stick to real WRPG's that are actually good.

Lol, you mean WRPGs where you can walk up to an enemy, let him shoot/slice you while you feed the dogs, order a pizza, take college classes for 2 majors, come back and still have 99% of your health only for you to hit 1 button to kill every enemy in the game?

I enjoy both jrpg and wrpg, but your argument is crap, lol.
---
Mods thinking: "Alright, well I'm going to delete this topic, but first let me delete as many of these posts as I can! HohoMwahahhaha!!"

Hookups posted...

No, I'm passing on Dark Souls 2 because the previous 2 Souls games were trash. I also now believe From Soft are terrible developers because they willingly released and hyped such trash.

Another simple minded being for the collection, who is so simple and narrow minded they can't understand why something they don't like it good to others.
---
PLAYING - Far Cry 3 (360), Walking Dead (360), Tales Of Graces f (PS3)
MOST WANTED - FFvsXIII, GTAV, Ni No Kuni, Tales Of Xillia, Lightning Returns

Sinfullyvannila posted...

8f9g43k8ku7335p posted...

I'm passing on Dark Souls 2 because those games are boring as hell. They're not as challenging as people make them out to be when you can hide behind a shield or easily roll out of the A.I.'s predictably slow attacks.

I'll stick to real WRPG's that are actually good.

Tell me when one of those actually comes out. It's been a while.

Many come out every year, with many more in 2013 I'm sure.

Here let me correct you on some things:
A. I am not going topic to topic, finding him and then commenting on him.
B. I did not call him a dick. I said he is being a dick. That is totally different from calling him himself a dick.
C. Using that logic, anyone who responds to anything in a thread, if it is opposite of what someone has said is provoking users to respond inappropriately. So if I said "I like apples." and you responded "I like pears." then that could be seen as you provoking others to respond inappropriately.

Defending others who have a different opinion than you is not doing the same.

Also if someone is wrong about something, I will call them out on it, whether its the same person or not.
@jubjub

A. You mentioned him doing it in one other topic, which you were in calling him out, and then this one, in which you are doing the same thing. Just saying.Also, unless you are stalking him, how do you know he's purposefully following the other guy around? One could assume ther same of you in this case easily.

B. ...semantics... It's still a petty insult to put him down so you can feel better than him. Either way needlessly insulting and trolling.

C. Again, you missed the point where you insulted him to try and make your point more valid and his less valid. Insulting the person would be the trolling part. And again, you followed him from the other topic to this one.

I'm just calling you out fro being wrong on something too buddy. Or would you like to continue being a dick about it? BTW, according to YOU I'm not trolling you by saying you're acting like a childish, douchebag dick, right? I'm not calling you one, you're just acting that way.
---
...to boldly split infinitives that no man had split before...