Not really. The only reason they even ported it to the 360 is because I believe it was easy (relatively speaking)...where-as the PS3 is so different they might not have the time or money to invest in trying to port it. Or if they DID, it might not be up to the standards they want. They're a pretty small dev team, so yeah.
Solid's snake still shoots liquid, it's just that it's null.
No it's sadly not coming to ya guys. CDPR said they don't have the man power(They're a small group) to do a port for all 3 consoles(Since the PS3 infrastructure is different, and not as easy to port to from PC to Xbox) So instead of risking a lousy port(Looking at you Skyrim) they said they wouldn't want to take the risk. Now they could port it if their team gets bigger, but that wont be for a while.
BUT, Cyberpunk(Their next game) is SUPPOSED to come to all 3 platforms, and so will The Witcher 3.
Average mind set of SOME GFaq Users If it's the same it's boring. If it's different condemn it to death.
^Lies. Witcher 2 is great. Storyline is leagues better than the non existent story in Dark Souls. Combat is just as challenging (Dark Mode) as you'd find in Dark Souls just not as varied as Swords are the majority of weapon choice.
Witcher 2 is a lot of fun. You're doing yourself a disservice by skipping this game if you have a 360 or gaming PC (Steam has it on sale now for $7.50). The story and acting are excellent, decisions you make throughout the game actually matter in the end, and the combat is much better than average for the genre. Not to mention it's beautiful. And boobies. It's unfortunate that the PS3-only crowd don't get a chance to experience this one.