This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Killzone 4 screenshots - need to be seen for graphical presentation of the Ps4

#81RhytenPosted 2/21/2013 7:37:41 AM
I sure as hell don't, otherwise I would be stuck on consoles with sub-30 fps and barely 720p low graphics ;)
---
Antec Neo Eco 620w | Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P | i5 2500k 3.3 Ghz | EVGA Gtx 570 1280 Mb | 8 Gb DDR 3 1333 Mhz | WD 1 Tb 7200 Rpm SATA 3 | HP 2011x 20" 1600x900
#82SomnusNemorisPosted 2/21/2013 7:40:03 AM
You clearly do. I have perfect eyesight as routinely claimed by whichever optician I visit every year. I see KZ2 as actually beating the target render. So does everyone in the comments sections for the numerous comparison videos around the internet, such as on GameTrailers, etc.

It's okay, it's fine to be wrong, you shouldn't feel so bad about it :)
#83RollingCradlePosted 2/21/2013 9:17:51 AM
Are you serious? the KZ2 target render looked way better then the final game - it was CG!
#84TerotrousPosted 2/21/2013 9:21:49 AM
They look nice, but they're obviously not gameplay shots, so be prepared for the actual game to look substantially worse.
---
http://terosclassicgaming.blogspot.com/ - Watch me beat "GBA Summon Night Swordcraft Story"
http://www.backloggery.com/tero - My backloggery
#85EvilTrashPosted 2/21/2013 9:33:39 AM
atopp399 posted...
Some of the FMV vids from Final Fantasy VIII on the original Playstation looked this good. Prerendered footage means nothing and it's almost a guarantee this footage was prerendered or run on a high end PC for presentation purposes.


This:
http://www.freewebs.com/lpfriend/Final_Fantasy_VIII_03.jpg

Does not look as good as this:
http://www.abload.de/img/1shows.jpg

And did you watch the presentation last night? It was real-time, he was free controlling the camera during most of these scenes and there was seamless transition from every moment so nothing was pre-rendered.
#86SomnusNemorisPosted 2/21/2013 9:37:14 AM
RollingCradle posted...
Are you serious? the KZ2 target render looked way better then the final game - it was CG!


As I said, I can post those comparisons if you like, and how everyone agrees it beat the target render.

In fact, I'll just own with this now:

http://s2d1.turboimagehost.com/sp/ef5f9365ab903e68b392cd062a8f3ffd/killzone2-e3-vs-now.jpg
#87CyborgTwentyPosted 2/21/2013 9:38:12 AM
lostkiwi posted...
And yet people were honestly saying that it looked like a PS3 title?

They look incredible.


it couldn't be done on ps3 but 360 could EASILY handle these graphics.
#88ManuKesnaPosted 2/21/2013 9:59:02 AM
CyborgTwenty posted...
lostkiwi posted...
And yet people were honestly saying that it looked like a PS3 title?

They look incredible.


it couldn't be done on ps3 but 360 could EASILY handle these graphics.


Hahahahahahahaha
---
PSN: Manu-Kesna
GT: ManuKesna
#89SomnusNemorisPosted 2/21/2013 10:07:54 AM
ManuKesna posted...
Hahahahahahahaha


I know, man. When the trolling is unintelligent with no subtlety like that, then it can't possibly be annoying, and is just hilarious instead.
#90PhewfusPosted 2/21/2013 10:18:55 AM
That's why it is indeed as big a leap as prior generations. Well at least from PS2 to PS3. SNES to N64 was pretty mind blowing after all.

Not really.

This is nothing like the improvements the PS3 had over the PS2. We aren't going from SD with low rez textures and characters to HD with higher rez and more complex character geometry or from 2D to 3D graphics.

This is more like comparing a vanilla PC game on medium settings to max settings.