SF characters are all ridiculously powerful compared to Tekken characters. Also, Tekken characters are all slow as balls, so they wouldn't be able to punish anything. Sagat vs. Bruce would just be Bruce eating tiger shots all day, and maybe an uppercut here and there if he tried doing any move at all. --- Duckets.
The Tekken characters are for the most part realistic (fighting style wise), and comparing them to the people from Street Fighter is rather pointless. If you want to make a comparison at least pick someone who's similar like DoA or Virtua Fighter. --- "What does that mean anyway? 'Whole nine yards'? Nine yards of what? Now it's gonna bug me all day." PSN ID: Heavenly_Adam
obviously SF rape due to the fact they can fireball, what I mean is .. imagine if only used their fightings styles. Not no BS tekken vs sf crossover. like sagat vs bruce , he'd murder bruce due to his size. balrog vs steve, steve quicker he'd ko balrog. if SF didn't have projectiles, double jumping flying off walls, they all have their respectable fighting styles. like how would Ken's karate stand against Paul's. Paul is more powerful , whilst Ken is faster. Tough call.
speed is what you want to make of it. capcom with its many speeds to pick from confuses everyone on thinking how fast everyone can be. then again we have bob. then we'll have to take in other factors, like personality, size, age etc. someone like chun-li would probably smack xiaoyu around with em massive thighs.