LOL at Steve Austin's overall.

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006
  3. LOL at Steve Austin's overall.
6 years ago#1
If you watched WWE during 1998-99 you know he should be waaaaaaaaaaay higher.

Aren't the legend superstars supposed to be in their primes? Austin during his prime beat the Undertaker clean.
---
Less than a thimble full of iodine separates the intellectual from the imbecile.
6 years ago#2
i think yukes based him on 2000-2001 years version
---
Will Ichigo Kurosaki ever have tea with Sousuke Aizen?
http://s1.zetaboards.com/TheSanctuaryForum/index/ | http://bit.ly/FST500
6 years ago#3
Overalls mean nothing in this game for the most part. The only stats that really matter are Strength, Durability and Submission. Everything else is basically pointless.
---
"Hank if you're steering then who's taking off your shirt!!!" -Dale Gribble
CoLa
6 years ago#4
No it's definitely not 2001 Austin. He would've had his disturbed theme.
---
Less than a thimble full of iodine separates the intellectual from the imbecile.
6 years ago#5
i agree. austin should've been at least a 95 just like 80s hogan.

---
i'm crazy!
6 years ago#6

I dunno. His look is based on post attitude, with the 2 knee braces, but stat wise.. I mean 7.5 in strength? Should have been an 8 IMO, it's probably based on austin post attitude, the loeading screen of him is a pretty recent pic at the time.

  1. Boards
  2. WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006
  3. LOL at Steve Austin's overall.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived