LOL at Steve Austin's overall.

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006
  3. LOL at Steve Austin's overall.

User Info: nuffsaid07

nuffsaid07
7 years ago#1
If you watched WWE during 1998-99 you know he should be waaaaaaaaaaay higher.

Aren't the legend superstars supposed to be in their primes? Austin during his prime beat the Undertaker clean.
Less than a thimble full of iodine separates the intellectual from the imbecile.

User Info: Oreno5267

Oreno5267
7 years ago#2
i think yukes based him on 2000-2001 years version
Will Ichigo Kurosaki ever have tea with Sousuke Aizen?
http://s1.zetaboards.com/TheSanctuaryForum/index/ | http://bit.ly/FST500

User Info: vipermckay

vipermckay
7 years ago#3
Overalls mean nothing in this game for the most part. The only stats that really matter are Strength, Durability and Submission. Everything else is basically pointless.
"Hank if you're steering then who's taking off your shirt!!!" -Dale Gribble
CoLa

User Info: nuffsaid07

nuffsaid07
7 years ago#4
No it's definitely not 2001 Austin. He would've had his disturbed theme.
Less than a thimble full of iodine separates the intellectual from the imbecile.

User Info: winnies_revenge

winnies_revenge
6 years ago#5
i agree. austin should've been at least a 95 just like 80s hogan.
i'm crazy!

User Info: Carribean_Cool

Carribean_Cool
6 years ago#6

I dunno. His look is based on post attitude, with the 2 knee braces, but stat wise.. I mean 7.5 in strength? Should have been an 8 IMO, it's probably based on austin post attitude, the loeading screen of him is a pretty recent pic at the time.

  1. Boards
  2. WWE SmackDown! vs. Raw 2006
  3. LOL at Steve Austin's overall.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived