Would it be better to use a 2 hander that has 79dps and has 112 str or to dual wield 1 handers that have 46dps and 116 str each? Thanks --- "The more things change, the more they stay the same" -Snake Plissken Escape from L.A.
#2col237Posted 5/19/2012 5:25:34 PM
Pretty sure the 2 hander would give you more damage.
#3I_Dwell_WithinPosted 5/19/2012 5:26:00 PM
I dual wield. if spec'd properly, it will do more DPS than a 2 hand or sword/ shield. --- XBL GT - Rybie Magoo
#4therickmu25Posted 5/19/2012 5:27:39 PM
I use 1 legendary weapon and a shield because it's more efficient damage wise right now. Plus I like the look of having a shield. --- i5 2500k @4.5Ghz, 2x EVGA OC GTX 560ti, Gigabyte Z68 UD3H Motherboard, 8GB G.Skill Sniper, 1 TB HDD, 750W Corsair TX PSU. Corsair 500R case
#5g0tbeef89Posted 5/19/2012 5:28:04 PM
What happened to Barbarians being able to dual wield 2 handers? Did they take that away? --- Ignoring all from tote and toast. Toss Veto7: Korhal, Metal, Entomb
#63starborrisPosted 5/19/2012 5:34:58 PM
g0tbeef89 posted... What happened to Barbarians being able to dual wield 2 handers? Did they take that away?
i think that's what the mighty weapons are supposed to be, they are pretty large.
#7Masterjeff54Posted 5/19/2012 5:36:55 PM
Every melee i see in inferno is using a shield. --- Treeja lvl 85 Tauren Druid *The Forgotten Coast Kneegrodomus lvl 85 Orc Death Knight * The Forgotten Coast
#8KingRajeshPosted 5/19/2012 5:42:24 PM
I use 2h's because I love BIG damage numbers over small, quicker damage.
Plus, nothing beats one shotting a huge host of mobs.
Note: Level 55, in Hell.
#9AvisonPosted 5/19/2012 5:59:01 PM
The attack damage value is only counted on the primary. This makes wielding a weapon in the offhand kinda useless. Shields work better because you get the defensive stats and can stack strength and vitality on them. --- -True knowledge is understanding why you truly know nothing. GT: "Avison Atrius" BB Mains: Hakumen, Arakune