How long does it take you to completely rule out SE
Add user to Ignore List after reporting
3 years ago#11
3 years ago#12
Well, I've never liked Square Enix (or Squaresoft for that matter since I'm a newbie to the FF franchise), so in the first place, I can't really rule the company out completely.
I can begin to understand, though, the frustration that some of Squaresoft's veteran supporters feel when they see their favorite games being churned out (in inferior fashion) for eternity.
3 years ago#13
joshakasupa posted...if versus comes out "rushed" whatsoever i will never play a 1st team SQE title again
who actually thinks they would have started from scratch to make a ps4 version if that's really even what they are doing?
3 years ago#14
I guess everyone will finally move on and take SE with a lesser grain of salt after this. Or are you guys done with SE after this? Im sure there are some, no?
Versus isn't making me go ape ****. I don't go crazy over any video game. So you can only speak for yourself and a few others. Also SE always been about graphics. It's funny you would even say that when I've been hearing that complaint since FFX in its prime.
I would "rule" out SE only if they stop making games that interest me. So far they haven't. So they will continue to get my attention. If they ever do stop making games that appeal to me then I will stop. Fortunately, I'm a far bigger fan of some other jrpgs than I am of FF. I always believe FF isn't the pinnacle of jrpgs. In fact, I think the series overrated by the fans despite being one of my favorite jrpgs series.
"Your arms are too short to box with God!"
3 years ago#15
Sir_Tom_Jones posted...I guess everyone will finally move on and take SE with a lesser grain of salt after this. Or are you guys done with SE after this? Im sure there are some, no?
When Rice gives you lemons, you squirt them in her eyes
Official JiggsMaster of the Series Ruining Pokemon X Board
3 years ago#16
Burdicus posted...I'm never going to rule out SE. Just because they have proven they are capable of publishing and developing CRAP doesn't mean that they aren't still capable of striking gold.
I'm not saying it will be. I'm just saying they are still a big game developer and publishing company, they are capable of great things.
For example, I'm thankful they published Nier, Deus Ex, and Tomb Raider. Capcom is perfectly capable of making garbage as well, but I recently picked up Dragon's Dogma and I'm loving it. Most people argue that Level 5's White Knight Chronicals franchise was a bust, but Ni No Kuni is great...
My point is that I will judge an individual title by it's contents, not by it's publisher or developer.
Currently playing: Ni No Kuni, Dragon's Dogma
Currently replaying: FFVIII, SotC
3 years ago#17
I think the one that'll kinda make me ignore SE, is if Nomura leaves it. He probably makes most of my favorite things from it.
3 years ago#18
I will rule them out if they quietly convert the game back to Command Synergy Battle (CSB) and make it a series of hallways like XIII, or if they release PS3 exclusive far too late for the PS3 to have any relevance. There's almost no reason if they aren't making it for PS4, to take till 2015-2016 to release the game. Unless it's going to be an extremely large game like skyrim. They may as well make it for PS4 if they aren't yet 50% complete, too much of the install base will move on by the middle of the next console generation. I've heard of some games releasing for PS2 a while after PS3/360's release, but I think those are usually lower budget games. I'd rule them out if they include disc locked dlc, required dlc to see the original ending, game breaking bugs, or if they don't actually have much content in the game. I don't believe we should have to show much leniency given the long development time. I'd also probably hate it if they add online multiplayer (not talking about co op), especially if they try to make it ripoff CoD or other online multiplayer centered games.
Vs will hopefully be released this year or next year in which case it will still have relevance the ps4 is gonna be expensive on release and the ps3 will have a much larger base for a couple years so ps3 will be relevanf at least till 2015 probably depending how long it takes technology to advance to make the ps4 cheaper. That and if Sony continues with their current plans everyome will need their ps3s to play their ps3 games >.>
|More topics from this board...|
|How long should game take to beat? speed run? and to perfect?||TipsTrue||16||8/23 4:20AM|
|Wait, the game intro is an hour and 45 minutes long?||benjjjamin||13||8/26 6:53PM|
|FFXV ATR 8/28/2016 - sans TalesRevenant||marko7||7||8/27 4:18PM|
|Nice, playstation access journalist says ffxv reminds her of FFX||Flamechamp2333||6||8/27 4:17PM|
|Just seen Kingsglaive, it was really good, far better then past FF movies Spoil||ColdOne666||9||8/27 4:16PM|