Why we removed religion...

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Sid Meier's Civilization V
  3. Why we removed religion...

User Info: iron_zealot7531

iron_zealot7531
7 years ago#1

Jon Shafer posted...
We made some changes with religion. Because diplomacy is one of our focuses with Civ V, planning what an AI leader is thinking, how he's going to win the game, that wasn't something that was meshing very well with the religion system. In Civ IV, the religions were primary factors of who liked whom and who disliked whom. And that wasn't meshing very well with what we wanted to do, so we decided to move on without the religion system. But that's mainly because we wanted diplomacy to have more depth and not be so predictable. We wanted to make sure that the AI leaders were taking into account the same things as the player was taking into account. A player might not care what religion you're running, but they might care quite a bit if you attack one of their friends.

This is what lead designer Jon Shafer had to say about the issue of removing religion in an interview with PC gamer. I really can't comprehend how so many people are so butthurt over it's removal. Religion in CivIV made diplomacy simplistic and arbitrary. It's removal is a good thing.

User Info: CoD4_FunGAMEz

CoD4_FunGAMEz
7 years ago#2
Lame. I enjoyed sending religious missionaries on a crusade to spread my civilization's faith to others and usually this will create a bondage among many civilizations that adapt my faith. Often we would have Holy Wars as well if any other civilization isn't my religion...

User Info: ViperMask

ViperMask
7 years ago#3
At least no one will have a chance at a religion monopoly anymore.

User Info: flipinchicago

flipinchicago
7 years ago#4
I enjoyed the religion system. Also I really enjoyed the sounds the missionaries/building made. Although the Islam horn (was it a horn...?) was really nasally.
good Samaritan or evil simian?

User Info: Lord Blade

Lord Blade
7 years ago#5
We wanted to make sure that the AI leaders were taking into account the same things as the player was taking into account. A player might not care what religion you're running, but they might care quite a bit if you attack one of their friends.

I remember having many leaders who shared my religion hate me for attacking their friends... and breaking deals... and trading with their enemies... and spying on them... and not helping them with their ridiculous demands... :p

Having the same religion was something like +2 to how well they liked you.
But the -10+ you got from the bad things far outweighed it.

I've also had civs of a different religion who ended up my allies.
"I'm the pretty one." - Oghren

User Info: Yellow_Monkey

Yellow_Monkey
7 years ago#6
He doesn't actually explicitly state that religion has been removed, only that "we made some changes with religion." I could see a system where you're rewarded for spreading your religion (much like in Civ IV) but are penalized, at least initially, for allowing foreign religions into your boarders. That way the computer players will be mad if you try to convert their populations, and may also be mad (to a lesser degree) if you don't let them convert your population.
There was once a place I thought was a dream but it actually wasn't real at all

User Info: Cyco_Chicken

Cyco_Chicken
7 years ago#7

I love sending missonairys and soldiers to a holy war trying to spread my religion.

User Info: Freakazoidian

Freakazoidian
7 years ago#8
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

User Info: Supramundane-

Supramundane-
6 years ago#9

I enjoyed the benefits of having spread all religions in my land.. With the civic Free Religion people were stoked.. It sure made it easier not having a lot of luxuries.

User Info: vahram90

vahram90
6 years ago#10

Thats a shame, the income from religion was a critical facet of making large forces. Without that variable I do not see how immense armies will be funded.

  1. Boards
  2. Sid Meier's Civilization V
  3. Why we removed religion...

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived