thats over 6 months old... taken from the damn closed beta --- She was pregnant 7 times last year and still hasn't had a baby yet. - Riff Raff http://i.imgur.com/Laa8U.jpg http://tinyurl.com/9bahrla
#4ShieldSlashPosted 8/25/2012 11:54:42 AM
I've seen more Guardians than anything so far.
#5r7gerrabbitPosted 8/25/2012 11:58:00 AM
Guardians, Warriors, and Elementalists. --- http://i.imgur.com/Mqy7G.gif
#6ChargrilledPosted 8/25/2012 11:58:01 AM
i picked a charr warrior.
and there did seem to be a lot of charr melee centric characters in the starting area.
but hey, its a new game. all starter areas probably have loads of people in them. --- GT : DeadJericho / PSN : Focalpoint / Correct terminology is 'Could NOT care less'. Learn English!
#7_GRIM_FANDANGO_Posted 8/25/2012 12:04:12 PM
I have been planning to go necro for 6 months.
Then release came and pretty randomly I decided to roll a guardian instead. --- I5 760 | MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II | 8GB 1600MHz | WD 1TB 7200Rpm | Corsair VX 550w | CM Gladiator | Samsung S24A350H | Board Corsair K90 | Mouse Corsair M90
#8The_Madd_HatterPosted 8/25/2012 12:07:17 PM
i was doing the starting area and saw more thieves than should be ever allowed in one spot --- There is no try, only do and do not.
#9Retroxgamer0Posted 8/25/2012 12:09:14 PM
everyone plays everything. 1% differences are subtle. the only reason theres less rangers is because people are trying the engineer the new class. necromancers are prob a least fav by nature, thats every game. necros and warlocks arent a super popular breed. that said, its still 11% vs 13% not bad.
#10Witch ElfPosted 8/25/2012 12:10:38 PM
I'm seeing a lot of mesmers and necromancers.
Of course, that may be because they're so visible. All the melee classes kinda phase together ('cept the Guardian 'cause they're all bright and shiny). --- "Aw, what did they do to Jenny?" - The Darkness