Samhain2012Posted 3/28/2008 8:05:17 AM | Thanks for any answers. |
RW_BearPosted 3/28/2008 8:09:00 AM | Yes. |
Phoenixx86Posted 3/28/2008 8:09:11 AM | Both.
--- AMD Athlon 64 x2 3800+ @ 2.45GHZ :: ASUS A8N5X S939 :: Kingston 2x1GB DDR400 XFX Geforce 7900GS 525M Extreme 256MB @ 600/1600MHZ :: WD Caviar 160GB SATA HDD |
Samhain2012 (Topic Creator) Posted 3/28/2008 8:09:53 AM | They both do? Is it any good? Also, which game is generally considered the better of the two? I heard that 2 has better features such as sprinting, but 1 is generally the more enjoyable experience. |
Metal3122Posted 3/28/2008 8:24:11 AM | Both were good, but Vegas 1 had a couple parts that were incredibly frustrating and I never want to go through again. Your choice. Not much difference between the two. --- "People here tend to be like game hermits... who will probably crush any pride you have for your achievements..."-animeflip360 |
Biocide69Posted 3/28/2008 8:28:49 AM | They are both good, the story is kind of your basic action movie predictible plot. but it's still entertaining. |
Sensfan19_15Posted 3/28/2008 8:44:41 AM | first one didnt have offline co-op campaign.... --- If the US were to ever get taken over, I'll be the first to become a freedom fighter. http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/296/22856334tn6.jpg |
SmilerAlPosted 3/28/2008 11:51:47 AM | Uhhh yes it did ^^^ --- PSN: SmilerAl |