Additional Content

#231Olivier HaguePosted 11/7/2008 10:33:16 AM
>So...it was you then?

I'm one of the guys SyberiaWinx is referring to, yeah.
#232SyberiaWinxPosted 11/7/2008 5:53:26 PM
I have not edited Wikipedia in years, and I have no desire to, mainly because of people like you. Your slander of me needs to stop.

Also, the trio in question have been making harmful edits to numerous articles. When anyone disagrees with one of their edits, that person is immediately labelled a sockpuppet and blocked by the admin of the trio. Before the block, they go around harassing the user on their talk page, violating various rules, and undoing their edits on whatever pages they can. Sometimes, they'll even use this method to attract new victims, and when that person asks them to stop, they start making accusations. I've known a few of the people who have gotten blocked, and there was nothing to even remotely suggest they were duplicate accounts of anyone. You should see what they've done to articles. One dozens of articles, they incorrectly changed the capitalization of a game title-it appears multiple times in each article and took someone a lot of trouble to fix originally. This would be the "Wild ARMs" articles, which they've made the "Wild Arms" articles.-.- They altered the way character names are used on the Siren page, they refuse to allow Time Hollow to be called a spiritual successor to a game it is in fact one of, and they refuse to allow reception sections for articles, because the "fan opinion isn't notable". Most of this is available on the 623 board, and godspeed to everyone else who's pressing charges against these losers. Posing people's personal information is pretty sick.

I would also like to state that even when I editted on Wikipedia, I never used the name "SyberiaWinx", so I fail to see why I'm being slandered by these losers in the first place. You guys need to get lives and stop harassing people over the internet, not to mention stop ruining Wikipedia articles. You just looked for a scapegoat for your ridiculous crimes. The admins won't touch you, not matter how many rules you break, because you have one of them in your group. I will continue to hope you get banned, so that some peace can return to the internet. You know, not every single person who dares to disagree with you is a sockpuppet. Grow up and get that through your heads. Your twisted little game is just falling into a sick obsession now.-.-


---
http://ruleoftherose.proboards104.com/index.cgi-The best and largest Rule of Rose forum out there!^^
#233Olivier HaguePosted 11/7/2008 6:54:00 PM
I have not edited Wikipedia in years

That's a lie.
You've been editing Wikipedia since at least June 2006 until... well, today, as 67.163.193.239, SirShiek, RedRosePrincess, TomitakePrincess, WrathofSheik, 24.3.186.152, MagicalHopStep, 24.3.180.166, 76.120.173.40, Fragments of Jade, Weisheit-A Sane Kind of Madness, MidnightRukia, TwilightRukia, WhenTheyCry, IceQueenAvril, 76.120.153.223, MiyakoKajiro, Lamiroir, TheScrappedPrincess and AllPurposeCultural (I might have missed some of your sockpuppets and I hope you'll find it in your heart to forgive me).

When anyone disagrees with one of their edits, that person is immediately labelled a sockpuppet and blocked by the admin of the trio.

Actually, "that person" (always you) gets blocked simply because she (still you) is a sockpuppet. I realize that might be inconvenient for pathological liars such as you, but some administrators can check IPs in order to spot sockpuppet accounts, and... well, that's precisely what they did.
Of course, you've been told that before, so I guess you'll simply reply that Wikipedia admins are "corrupt", as usual. Because there is so much to gain from blocking SyberiaWinx.

I've known a few of the people who have gotten blocked

No kidding.

there was nothing to even remotely suggest they were duplicate accounts of anyone.

Er... Yeah, actually, there was a bunch of telling details. Because you really suck at pretending you're someone else.
And of course, those suspicions get confirmed every single time when the admins go and check the IP. ... Wait, sorry, they're "corrupt". I keep forgetting about that.

You should see what they've done to articles.

Yeah, 'cause SyberiaWinx won't show you. She's too busy making accusations to provide evidence.
Besides, fighting sinister, shadowy organizations such as the corrupt Anti-SyberiaWinx Wikipedia Administration is quite time-consuming, as you can imagine.
#234Olivier HaguePosted 11/7/2008 6:56:00 PM
This would be the "Wild ARMs" articles, which they've made the "Wild Arms" articles.-.-

Actually, they were "Wild Arms" articles in the first place until you changed them into "Wild ARMs" articles.
All of that simply because that's how XSEED Games (almost always) capitalize the title of the games. Never mind the fact XSEED Games only published three US games and all the other English-language publishers of Wild Arms games use "Wild Arms".

They altered the way character names are used on the Siren page

So that the article uses the same names the staff of the game does in Siren Maniacs. Oh, the infamy.

they refuse to allow reception sections for articles

SyberiaWinx is still referring to the fan outrage about the DS Rhapsody debacle.
Like I explained earlier, "duh". Superfluous. It goes without saying.

Most of this is available on the 623 board, and godspeed to everyone else who's pressing charges against these losers.

Yeah. Just so you know, SyberiaWinx keeps referring to a mysterious "623 board" that supposedly rights the wrongs of poor internet victims, such as herself, herself, and yet again herself.
The saddest part being that she doesn't realize I actually know about the oh-so-frightening "623 board":
http://mutsumi623.wordpress.com/
That's really just a (dead) blog she created months ago (under yet another alias, "Mutsumi") to provide "ammo" for another embarrassing "debate" here:
http://www.cosfu.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2200&st=90
She was using the alias "TragicValkyrie" in that topic, but as usual, she didn't fool anybody. Hilarity ensued.

Posing people's personal information is pretty sick.

Good thing that never happened.
Well, you did post some supposed personal "information" about me (such as my real name: "Thorton"! I never knew I was called that...). "Information" you claimed you got through some mysterious means: the (probably) dreaded "WAPS"!
"Wild Arms Protection Squad"? Who knows... It's all in her head anyway...
#235Olivier HaguePosted 11/7/2008 6:58:52 PM
I would also like to state that even when I editted on Wikipedia, I never used the name "SyberiaWinx", so I fail to see why I'm being slandered by these losers in the first place.

Because, like I (and others) said, you really suck at pretending you're someone else.

One example (among many, really):

On October 5, your sockpuppet account "TwilightRukia" gets blocked while you were arguing about the capitalization of "Wild Arms":
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATwilightRukia
19 minutes later, you create this topic on GameFAQs:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=199299&topic=45802887

On October 12, your sockpuppet account "WhenTheyCry" gets blocked while you were arguing about the capitalization of "Wild Arms":
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AWhenTheyCry
1 hour and 19 minutes later, you create this topic on GameFAQs:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=931326&topic=45924136

On October 21, your sockpuppet account "TheScrappedPrincess" gets blocked while you were trying to push your edits on the Rhapsody article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATheScrappedPrincess
35 minutes later, you post in this very topic about "the Wikipedia situation".

On November 7, your sockpuppet account "AllPurposeCultural" gets blocked:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AAllPurposeCultural
11 minutes later, you post (again) in this very topic about "the Wikipedia situation".

Good job, Syb! That's not telling or anything, really.

I will continue to hope you get banned, so that some peace can return to the internet.

I'm really sorry about terrorizing the internet and stuff, guys. Seriously.

You know, not every single person who dares to disagree with you is a sockpuppet.

Yeah, I kinda knew that already. But you're the only one I've ever accused of sockpuppetry, so it's all good.

Grow up

Heh.

Anyway, my point is: I don't think it would be a good idea to take SyberiaWinx's "crusade" too seriously, or her posts at face value.
You can check around how she's been doing here and on other forums (gotta love how she accused another GameFAQs member of raping and murdering her sister, for example... yeah, she went there), see for yourself what's really been going on Wikipedia, and make your own mind. In the end, I think you'll come to realize that... well, "girl's got issues", and that's about it.
#236SyberiaWinxPosted 11/7/2008 7:53:51 PM
"That's a lie.
You've been editing Wikipedia since at least June 2006 until... well, today, as 67.163.193.239, SirShiek, RedRosePrincess, TomitakePrincess, WrathofSheik, 24.3.186.152, MagicalHopStep, 24.3.180.166, 76.120.173.40, Fragments of Jade, Weisheit-A Sane Kind of Madness, MidnightRukia, TwilightRukia, WhenTheyCry, IceQueenAvril, 76.120.153.223, MiyakoKajiro, Lamiroir, TheScrappedPrincess and AllPurposeCultural (I might have missed some of your sockpuppets and I hope you'll find it in your heart to forgive me)"

Actually, THAT is a lie. My one and only account on Wikipedia has not been used in years, and it is not blocked either. I don[t see "SyberiaWinx" among any of those names either, yet you claim they're all me? And for the record, I know one or two of those people you listed, so I know they're different people.


"Actually, "that person" (always you) gets blocked simply because she (still you) is a sockpuppet. I realize that might be inconvenient for pathological liars such as you, but some administrators can check IPs in order to spot sockpuppet accounts, and... well, that's precisely what they did.
Of course, you've been told that before, so I guess you'll simply reply that Wikipedia admins are "corrupt", as usual. Because there is so much to gain from blocking SyberiaWinx."

Nice try, but the reason those accounts get blocked is because you have an admin who is friends of yours. And corruption on Wikipedia is hardly news. You guys get those people blocked because they disagree with you. I've done my research, and there's never been anything to make them seem to be the same person.


"Er... Yeah, actually, there was a bunch of telling details. Because you really suck at pretending you're someone else."

I've heard these "reasons" and they suck. Your most common one is how your victims sign there messages. At first, you claimed every user who signed their comments right after them with no space inbetween, even though there is nothing in the description of signing that says that is supposed to be done. Then, when people did sign in what you consider the "proper" way, you still said they were duplicate accounts, trying to fool you And then you tried to claim innocent typos or mispellings made people duplicate accounts. You just grasp at whatever you can find, and there's really nothing at all in terms of evidence..


"Actually, they were "Wild Arms" articles in the first place until you changed them into "Wild ARMs" articles.
All of that simply because that's how XSEED Games (almost always) capitalize the title of the games. Never mind the fact XSEED Games only published three US games and all the other English-language publishers of Wild Arms games use "Wild Arms"."

I did mention it was originally "Wild Arms" on the pages, but that was changed months ago, because it was incorrect. XSEED confirmed that the official title of the series has always been "Wild ARMs", they gave reasons for the other capitalizations, showed a section of the WA5 site that even described why the title was capitalized the way it was, and even fans of the game told them that it should be "ARMs". Anyone who has played the games knows this, and as many have told you "Arms" makes no sense whatsover. You made those edits solely to harass people, and you have even admitted that you've never played the series, just like you've never played Siren or Rhapsody or any of the other games whose pages you target.


---
http://ruleoftherose.proboards104.com/index.cgi-The best and largest Rule of Rose forum out there!^^
#237SyberiaWinxPosted 11/7/2008 8:13:49 PM
"So that the article uses the same names the staff of the game does in Siren Maniacs. Oh, the infamy."

Replacing almost all uses of the first names with the last names was inconsisten and sounded stupid. You even undid various compromises people tried to get you off their back. All you want is to harass.


"SyberiaWinx is still referring to the fan outrage about the DS Rhapsody debacle.
Like I explained earlier, "duh". Superfluous. It goes without saying."

Fan reaction is what reception is. Who the heck else do you think buys and plays these games?


"Yeah. Just so you know, SyberiaWinx keeps referring to a mysterious "623 board" that supposedly rights the wrongs of poor internet victims, such as herself, herself, and yet again herself.
The saddest part being that she doesn't realize I actually know about the oh-so-frightening "623 board":
http://mutsumi623.wordpress.com/
That's really just a (dead) blog she created months ago (under yet another alias, "Mutsumi") to provide "ammo" for another embarrassing "debate" here:
http://www.cosfu.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2200&st=90
She was using the alias "TragicValkyrie" in that topic, but as usual, she didn't fool anybody. Hilarity ensued."

Anyone else see what I mean when I say this person is a stalker? Seriously, get a life. First, that is a blog, NOT a board. Second, cosfu is like the National Enquirer tabloids, only minus that little grain of truth tabloids have. Nice to know you get your information from a place like that. That site is full of nasty lies and rumors. You should hear the stuff they say about some really nice people, like Vic Mignogna. Those people are losers...guess you fit in there well. Everyone knows about that. 623 is related to that blog, but it's a forum. Get a clue.

---
http://ruleoftherose.proboards104.com/index.cgi-The best and largest Rule of Rose forum out there!^^
#238SyberiaWinxPosted 11/7/2008 8:14:34 PM
"Good thing that never happened.
Well, you did post some supposed personal "information" about me (such as my real name: "Thorton"! I never knew I was called that...). "Information" you claimed you got through some mysterious means: the (probably) dreaded "WAPS"!
"Wild Arms Protection Squad"? Who knows... It's all in her head anyway... "

WAPS? No idea what you're talking about, nor do I know any of your personal information. Unlike you, I have no interest in stalking people. And yes, you posted personal information of myself and a few other people. You and I had never even come into contact in any way. In fact, up until now, we never had at all.


"On October 5, your sockpuppet account "TwilightRukia" gets blocked while you were arguing about the capitalization of "Wild Arms":
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATwilightRukia
19 minutes later, you create this topic on GameFAQs:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=199299&topic=45802887"

TwilightRukia is a friend of mine, one of the ones I mentioned. And yes, I'm a fan of the series. Not that any WA fan who goes to Wikipedia didn't take notice of your vandalism.


"On October 12, your sockpuppet account "WhenTheyCry" gets blocked while you were arguing about the capitalization of "Wild Arms":
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AWhenTheyCry
1 hour and 19 minutes later, you create this topic on GameFAQs:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=931326&topic=45924136"

Your point? That was when I was forwarded the email from XSEED, so I decided to post it.


On October 21, your sockpuppet account "TheScrappedPrincess" gets blocked while you were trying to push your edits on the Rhapsody article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATheScrappedPrincess
35 minutes later, you post in this very topic about "the Wikipedia situation".

I posted about the Wikipedia situation here long before this. If it weren't for you suddenly claiming I was creating sockpuppets, I never would have heard about this most likely. Of course, I guess I would have noticed the vandalism to the Wild ARMs articles.


"On November 7, your sockpuppet account "AllPurposeCultural" gets blocked:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AAllPurposeCultural
11 minutes later, you post (again) in this very topic about "the Wikipedia situation

Good job, Syb! That's not telling or anything, really."

You're right, it's not telling. You are the one who brought me into this, so I do visit Wikipedia and keep an eye on you every couple of weeks. You're mentally unstable. I noticed you had claimed yet another innocent victim based on nothing more than your accusations and decided to bring it up. Your lies can't exist forever.


"Yeah, I kinda knew that already. But you're the only one I've ever accused of sockpuppetry, so it's all good."

I like how you ignore what I've been saying since the beginning. You've yet to provide anything at all that actually points out I'm the creator of these alleged sockpuppets. Your lies are not funny. They're just pathetic.

---
http://ruleoftherose.proboards104.com/index.cgi-The best and largest Rule of Rose forum out there!^^
#239SyberiaWinxPosted 11/7/2008 8:14:53 PM
"Anyway, my point is: I don't think it would be a good idea to take SyberiaWinx's "crusade" too seriously, or her posts at face value.
You can check around how she's been doing here and on other forums (gotta love how she accused another GameFAQs member of raping and murdering her sister, for example... yeah, she went there), see for yourself what's really been going on Wikipedia, and make your own mind. In the end, I think you'll come to realize that... well, "girl's got issues", and that's about it."

Said person you mention brought up information about my sister, and I got angry. They knew things that were never supposed to be released to the public. Said user turned out to be someone who knows me in real life who I got into a fight with, thus prompting them to start taunting me about Missy. It was a sick thing, and they never should have done it. They have, however, apologized, and I've given them the benefit of the doubt and am trying to forgive them.


You know, your posts just make you look like a really creepy stalker.


---
http://ruleoftherose.proboards104.com/index.cgi-The best and largest Rule of Rose forum out there!^^
#240Olivier HaguePosted 11/7/2008 8:30:05 PM
I don't see "SyberiaWinx" among any of those names either, yet you claim they're all me?

Well, yeah. Perhaps you could tell me how the fact you haven't used the name "SyberiaWinx" on Wikipedia means all those accounts aren't yours. That should be fascinating.

the reason those accounts get blocked is because you have an admin who is friends of yours. And corruption on Wikipedia is hardly news.

Sure. Also? I shot JFK.

I've done my research

Yeah, that's what you always say when you pretend to be a new user and keep referring to what happened to your previous sockpuppets. That's not exactly clever, Syb.

Your most common one is how your victims sign there messages. At first, you claimed every user who signed their comments right after them with no space inbetween, even though there is nothing in the description of signing that says that is supposed to be done.

For the nth time, the problem isn't that there's some "rule" saying that there should be a space there. It's just that most users put one, and you didn't, no matter what user name you were using. That simply made your sockuppet accounts that much easier to spot, that is all.

when people did sign in what you consider the "proper" way

Yeah, eventually.

you still said they were duplicate accounts, trying to fool you

And failing miserably. Because, really, that was just one detail among many others. I'm afraid your "style" is unmistakable.

then you tried to claim innocent typos or mispellings made people duplicate accounts.

Yeah, you keep misspelling the same words other and other again. Despite the fact you've been told about that. Repeatedly. Kinda sad, really.

XSEED confirmed that the official title of the series has always been "Wild ARMs", they gave reasons for the other capitalizations

Yeah, in an "e-mail" you made up. Truly compelling "evidence". And yet, you seem to be very fond of that tactic.

Anyone who has played the games knows this

Which is why these Wild Arms wikis both use the capitalization "Wild Arms"?
http://wildarms.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
http://www.filgaia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
I guess these guys never played the games. You're the only true fan of the series there is, Syb.

as many have told you

'Twas you every single time.

you have even admitted that you've never played the series

Actually, I said I barely played one of the games. Not that it matters, really.

just like you've never played Siren

That's a funny one.