bad graphics or good graphics

#1punksk8er48erPosted 7/27/2008 5:14:33 PM
decide wether you think this gta game will be well planned or a rockstar failure
#2xF0xPosted 7/28/2008 3:17:30 AM
Judging by GTA4, graphics is a very important aspect for Rockstar. Maybe they will go with top-down view and make graphics look incredibly detailed and crisp instead of standard third person view with blocky and choppy 3D models..
Also, graphics in games is never a deciding factor for success...
"Unless its a farm!!"
#3ThoracicPosted 7/28/2008 4:41:49 AM
I think it will be well planned and turn out to be a success, the DS is such a popular system, I can't see them putting a game that could potentially sell millions on the system if it isn't any good. We'll see in a few months though.

As for graphics, I have never played a good game that has bad graphics, could you name a few?
#4RuiBettencourtPosted 7/28/2008 6:42:35 AM
Deus Ex: godly game, terrible graphics
#5KahblammoPosted 7/28/2008 6:53:34 AM
2D would work. Cell shaded would work. Low quality textures wont.
#6punksk8er48er(Topic Creator)Posted 7/28/2008 9:00:51 AM
its true that graphics dont really matter but if the game looks bad it might have less sells, awsome looks would make more sells, anyone get my point??
#7ShullianPosted 7/31/2008 11:55:49 AM

if this is like gta advanced im not getting it. bad graphics bad gameplay. it could work like a mobile ds version of gta 2 :D

#8halofanatic12Posted 8/5/2008 1:41:33 PM
it could look like phantom hourglass or super mario 64 those games were 3d and looked damn good on the ds
#9TX360Posted 8/7/2008 5:38:24 PM
im expecting 3D not 2D this is 2008 and gta would be great in 3d so if its 2d i may be put off.
#10horror_spookyPosted 8/7/2008 6:28:52 PM
^ Another ignorant statement by the same poster. Just because a game is in 2D doesn't mean it's behind the times and can't be any less fun.
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.