I'd do whatever was necessary to survive. I wouldn't attack or kill people I knew had nothing for no reason, I'd just attack whoever messed with me or if I knew they had items I could use --- GT: Leffttyy
I would just do my best to survive, by any means. I wouldnt go out of my way to be a dick, but I certainly wouldn't hesitate to kill if its to my benefit, or more specifically in self defense. It's likely that i'd get overwhelmed by a group, and killed at some point though. --- Where is my mind?
I think I would be just like the way you play the game. I would always help those that I could, but on that note, if I'm dying of thirst and that lone guy with the 5 gallon jug of water is being an ass.....my gun's in his face and I'm getting that ****! I would most likely kill him in the end though, to prevent retaliation.
theres scentific program in the background on right now speculating ... we' ll all be engulfed by a supervolcano, a gigantic magma ocean, and the dust will fascilitate nuclear winter. if anyones unfortuanate enough to survive, youll wish you hadnt, so i dont think itll matter whos good and whos bad.
Middle of the road. I would protect my possessions and my people, but would not be a dick to people and murder or steal from them without a reason. If someone needed help and it was within my power to do so, then I would help.
I'm optimistic and I think that the disaster shown in the game, with mainly earthquakes and dust, wouldn't be quite as bad as it is in the game. Eventually people would adapt, small communities would form, and then eventually trade / communicate with eachother. You can even see the beginnings of that in the game. There is good to balance out the bad. So I wouldn't be a bad guy, althought I sure wouldn't remain in the city.