ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played
3 years ago#1
80/80

Starting with the least

1. Sejuani
2. Viktor
3. Xerath
4. Urgot
5. Orianna
6. Gragas
7. Leona
8. Heimerdinger
9. Yorick
10. Karma

This is based off of http://www.lolstatistics.com/champions/all - sorting by popularity. Other notables low on the list, Galio, Rumble, Maoki, Trundle


There are quite a few very strong champs in this list, Urgot, strong anti carry, Vik/Xer/Gragas very strong APs, is pretty underrated as a support and Yorick never loses a lane.

Most popular - no surprises - Ash, GP, Soraka, Cait, Warwick
3 years ago#2
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?
3 years ago#3
MlREFOX posted...
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?

DING DING DING!

[/topic]
---
http://steamcommunity.com/id/randomdog
3 years ago#4
Shows stats for the previous 14 days
3 years ago#5
Sejuani es #1 ganker. Once someone picks her in a tournament she will become FOTM.
---
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe-1.jpg
3 years ago#6
yea you cant really go by last 14 days we need at least a few months to aggregate the data set....and I see less karmas than anything
---
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA
3 years ago#7
Strange, I almost never see other GPs... Although, even when I do, someone (else) invariably leaves the matchmaking queue, so I don't get to see how they play him...
---
I've decided to work on a VN, want in?
3 years ago#8
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc
3 years ago#9
Jomosapian posted...
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc


That's a fair point. Which makes it rather hard to make any statistical conclusions over the long run...I guess the best we acn do is "during the X patch, these champs were most/least used"
---
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA
3 years ago#10
The unfortunate thing about it is that Riot should take not of these sorts of statistics.

There's a reason you don't see half the champs on that list very often; they're very situational, UP, or in need of a buff. Yet they ignore and continue to neglect the people who need love the most (Heimerdinger, anyone?)
---
askpeevies: Guys guess what. WoW and FFXI aren't the only MMO's.
AuRamza: Go back to Korea
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived