ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

#1Toe_JamulonisPosted 3/2/2012 6:46:17 AM
80/80

Starting with the least

1. Sejuani
2. Viktor
3. Xerath
4. Urgot
5. Orianna
6. Gragas
7. Leona
8. Heimerdinger
9. Yorick
10. Karma

This is based off of http://www.lolstatistics.com/champions/all - sorting by popularity. Other notables low on the list, Galio, Rumble, Maoki, Trundle


There are quite a few very strong champs in this list, Urgot, strong anti carry, Vik/Xer/Gragas very strong APs, is pretty underrated as a support and Yorick never loses a lane.

Most popular - no surprises - Ash, GP, Soraka, Cait, Warwick
#2MlREFOXPosted 3/2/2012 7:04:13 AM
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?
#3NormalCatPosted 3/2/2012 7:05:52 AM
MlREFOX posted...
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?

DING DING DING!

[/topic]
---
http://steamcommunity.com/id/randomdog
#4Toe_Jamulonis(Topic Creator)Posted 3/2/2012 7:15:12 AM
Shows stats for the previous 14 days
#5StonedApe7200Posted 3/2/2012 7:24:58 AM
Sejuani es #1 ganker. Once someone picks her in a tournament she will become FOTM.
---
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe-1.jpg
#6XcZeus3469Posted 3/2/2012 7:28:21 AM
yea you cant really go by last 14 days we need at least a few months to aggregate the data set....and I see less karmas than anything
---
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA
#7flame_master14Posted 3/2/2012 7:30:01 AM
Strange, I almost never see other GPs... Although, even when I do, someone (else) invariably leaves the matchmaking queue, so I don't get to see how they play him...
---
I've decided to work on a VN, want in?
#8Toe_Jamulonis(Topic Creator)Posted 3/2/2012 7:39:41 AM
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc
#9XcZeus3469Posted 3/3/2012 6:39:47 AM
Jomosapian posted...
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc


That's a fair point. Which makes it rather hard to make any statistical conclusions over the long run...I guess the best we acn do is "during the X patch, these champs were most/least used"
---
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA
#10Master of HatePosted 3/3/2012 6:47:37 AM
The unfortunate thing about it is that Riot should take not of these sorts of statistics.

There's a reason you don't see half the champs on that list very often; they're very situational, UP, or in need of a buff. Yet they ignore and continue to neglect the people who need love the most (Heimerdinger, anyone?)
---
askpeevies: Guys guess what. WoW and FFXI aren't the only MMO's.
AuRamza: Go back to Korea