...this is exactly what I'm talking about. Makes 0 sense. --- Why not? Why not? Why not not, then, if the best reasoning you can contrive is why not? - David Foster Wallace
SIFAV7Posted 6/12/2012 9:58:43 PM
It's the only way I can punish you. We're dragging this to the bitter end. Specially when the other team sucks and can't end the game with a 20 kill lead.
Sin___Posted 6/12/2012 9:59:13 PM
Feeders don't get to surrender --- Steam/LoL(/D3): F5in(#1592) .:. http://youtube.com/SinOwns http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i298/dinkidooda/F5.png
zeppelin312Posted 6/12/2012 9:59:35 PM
how does it not make sense, I played a perfectly fine game and *insert name* runs into death 10 times in a row and then wants to give up. He/she can play through the **** game they made.
gallantgregPosted 6/12/2012 10:01:49 PM
Maybe if you try feeding more you can end the game quickly by yourself.
Or you could try to win it, but most people generally seem to be against that idea for some reason. --- Why of course I like pie!
IceAssassin2Posted 6/12/2012 10:10:18 PM
If you feed you have 0 right to surrender, not saying that surrendering is wrong, but 100% will vote no if its the scumbag feeder who starts the vote. --- xxmaramm: STOP THE HACKING! rascalz: are you on crack? SlackersUnite: The Carl Johnson IS C4, they just put all six charges into one rocket.
B01tPosted 6/12/2012 10:13:05 PM
By feeding, you just wasted a 20-60 minute chunk of time. losing because someone fed SUCKS, and will put you in a bad mood until you get a decent game. I don't drag games out anymore, but i don't regret the times where i voted no because i was upset.
Actions have consequences: Do poorly> feed>lose game>piss off other people
I always thought of it as pavlovian conditioning, myself. --- "That is why war is so tragic. To win means to make victims of your opponents and give birth to hatred." - Kratos Aurion, Tales of Symphonia