Ranked: Many Champions or Few?

#1POkemon_PoWeRPosted 12/8/2012 8:34:41 PM
Which is better? - Results (36 votes)
Be good at lot of champions
30.56% (11 votes)
11
Be perfect/flawless with a small amount of champions
69.44% (25 votes)
25
This poll is now closed.
Assuming that you have champions that fit every role and can play every role decently, which is better to have?
I'm watching videos and a lot of people are saying that it's better to be perfect with one or two champions because you'll get more elo playing them.
I'm contemplating doing this but still doubting it's validity.
---
I'm the best player here. The rest of you aren't as good as me-ninja1357
LoL IGN: m0bilize (NA)
#2FlameLord23Posted 12/8/2012 8:39:23 PM
Depends on the number of a "small amount". I would say a small amount i max 10, large is about 50. Being good at quite a few champions can allow you to be more versatile in team picks. I hate being good at about 5 champions, i'd rather be able to play more.
---
Violence is never the answer.
Because the answer is always Vlad.
#3T_M0neyPosted 12/8/2012 8:44:24 PM
my problem in ranked for a long time was i kept playing champs i wasnt great with. I still have a stable of a few champions for each role, but if i can play my preferred champion i will. Nothing wrong with playing a lot of champions, but its not always the way to go. Sometimes you can get a great counter pick though.
---
http://i448.photobucket.com/albums/qq210/tarpooon/old-bucs-logo.jpg