Logic Question: Marks

#1Edgemaster70000Posted 2/10/2013 3:48:50 PM
Since Riot has made Armor Penetration generally more expensive, would it be a better idea for AD champs to have Armor Pen marks than Attack Damage marks? Then you could just buy more AD in-game instead of the pricey Armor pen?
---
XBL GT: ReptileAssassin. Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/Emerl18
#2BlocktopusPosted 2/10/2013 3:53:19 PM
damn right.
---
http://i.imgur.com/cuYAp.gif
ign toki
#3SmishhhPosted 2/10/2013 4:05:30 PM(edited)
The AD marks are for very early game only, even before the balance changes armor pen marks meant more damage fairly early in the game against champions. That AD is for early laning damage, especially against minions since it makes last hitting easier. If you are very good at last hitting and don't try to engage early on then armor pen is better for you. By the time you bought substantial AD items it wouldn't really matter anymore I think.
#4happyscrub1Posted 2/10/2013 4:15:08 PM
I don't get why you can have both MagPen marks and AP glyps but you have to choose between either AD or ArmPen.
---
Happyscrub's league of legends rank is higher than 95% gamefaqs posters. This is why gamefaqs jealous of him. That's why they troll him. So sad, So bad, so mad.
#5Edgemaster70000(Topic Creator)Posted 2/10/2013 5:43:58 PM
happyscrub1 posted...
I don't get why you can have both MagPen marks and AP glyps but you have to choose between either AD or ArmPen.


Glyphs handle magic and resistances to magic, and marks are all offensive. Two types of Penetration, two available types of penetration marks.
---
XBL GT: ReptileAssassin. Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/Emerl18