Oh wow, Karma only has a 36.55% winrate after her remake?

#11OgreBattle019Posted 4/6/2013 9:40:33 PM
GoldenFantasy posted...
Trying too hard

0/10


clearly did not play karma before the patch
---
| . _-~^*''' o . ''*^-'|_--~^*'' .o ''*^-'|
R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio
#12_HeXPosted 4/6/2013 9:54:30 PM
SoraOwnsAll posted...
From: DarkEspeon996 | #002
Possibly because of all the people just picking her up and playing her for the first games.


wrong. using this logic, every new champ would have a horrible winrate. didn't rework kat and garen (kat hitting a 102% popularity according to lolking btw, from people picking her on both teams) still maintain an average win rate?


Katarina became OP has hell, and Garen is also really easy to win with. Karma has a high skillcap now and you can't build her straight AP or you'll just get blown up trying to trade with the enemy APC.
---
Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.
#13SumSmartDooodPosted 4/6/2013 10:45:35 PM
GoldenFantasy posted...
SumSmartDoood posted...
DarkEspeon996 posted...
Possibly because of all the people just picking her up and playing her for the first games.


Or because the new Karma is awful and probably worse than the old Karma.


Trying too hard

0/10


Your opinion is different than mine?

MUST BE TROLLING.
#14ZorenPosted 4/6/2013 10:53:05 PM
i dunno why they even remade her, making her tether damage on hit with mantra would have been a simple hotfix leaving her anywhere from balanced to maybe FotM status needing slight rebalancing.
---
Metroid DS name: Sacadam FC: 201931021467
Starcraft Broodwars: Newplayer1
#15P00DGEPosted 4/7/2013 1:30:21 AM
She soared in popularity, which means she was used in alot more games, and thus saw a huge drop in win rate. Before, only the small number of people who really loved her played her, and played her well.
#16CovenantPosted 4/7/2013 1:39:10 AM
Global winrate is an utterly useless statistic. 90+% of League players are awful at this game. Their experiences are not indicative of anything useful.
#17Dark_Luna3Posted 4/7/2013 4:38:15 AM(edited)
Aphoristic posted...
It's okay, she has buffs coming.


...Only to her early game -- which was decent already.

Her lategame will continue to be lackluster until they reduce the cooldown on her ult.

45/40/35/30 it should be. It has to scale. 45 CD is ridiculous lategame in most scenarios -- her mantra effects aren't -that- good considering she will only ever have a 3-spell combo instead of 4.

Her laning will be will pretty beast after these changes though, but at the end of the day she'll only come off as replica of LeBlanc -- but still slightly worse. WIn lane, lose game.

... Which was pretty much old Karma anyway. But at least she had a niche, although an unusual one at that. At least it was crazy good on TT.
#18ryudo500Posted 4/7/2013 4:41:06 AM
**** kit


**** champ
---
squaresoft
LAKERS & SPURS
#19BurnumMasterPosted 4/7/2013 4:51:18 AM
Covenant posted...
Global winrate is an utterly useless statistic. 90+% of League players are awful at this game. Their experiences are not indicative of anything useful.


Agree. If you care about global win rate you are saying that someone awful's win/loss contributes just as much to balance as a diamond player's win/loss. One of them obviously has a deeper understanding of the game.
---
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/BurnumMaster-1464/hero/2935592
#20happyscrub1Posted 4/7/2013 5:11:41 AM
P00DGE posted...
She soared in popularity, which means she was used in alot more games, and thus saw a huge drop in win rate. Before, only the small number of people who really loved her played her, and played her well.


Popularity doesn't make = lower win rates. Plenty of popular champs on both ends of the spectrum.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSIx7UwJjks
Enough picking on kids, back to 9-11