I think ranked should be locked

#1dennis941012Posted 4/21/2013 6:59:44 AM
untill people played and won 10 matches with at least 100 champions >_>
---
....
#2NicoGrimmPosted 4/21/2013 7:01:14 AM
Isn't that kind of the goal behind only unlocking ranked at level 30?
You're supposed to get familiar with a lot of champs, befre getting there, right?
---
"So selfish them" would be their cry. And, who'd be brave to argue? Doin' what you people need is never on the menu!
#3wantfastcarsPosted 4/21/2013 7:02:18 AM
10 wins with each of 100 champions? People should have 1000 wins (at least) before playing Ranked?

That's a little excessive. Perhaps 10 wins each with 10 different champions would be more realistic, if this incredibly unrealistic idea were ever implemented?
---
Now Playing: BL2, TF2, LoL
i5-3570k | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1600MHz RAM | EVGA GeForce GTX670 FTW | Asus P8Z77-V LK | Western Digital 7200RPM 1TB HDD
#4dennis941012(Topic Creator)Posted 4/21/2013 7:08:41 AM(edited)
From: wantfastcars | #003
10 wins with each of 100 champions? People should have 1000 wins (at least) before playing Ranked?

That's a little excessive. Perhaps 10 wins each with 10 different champions would be more realistic, if this incredibly unrealistic idea were ever implemented?


why not? I expect people to know counter,build, and synergy with every single champion
not oh I feel like playing this ________ because pro played him herp derp
and level 30 takes what? 150 games?

---
....
#5saint35Posted 4/21/2013 7:10:17 AM
Sure give me the Riot Points to unlock 100 Champions.
---
Why modern education is failing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM6c-HY8dck
#6wantfastcarsPosted 4/21/2013 7:15:22 AM(edited)
dennis941012 posted...
From: wantfastcars | #003
10 wins with each of 100 champions? People should have 1000 wins (at least) before playing Ranked?

That's a little excessive. Perhaps 10 wins each with 10 different champions would be more realistic, if this incredibly unrealistic idea were ever implemented?


why not? I expect people to know counter,build, and synergy with every single champion
not oh I feel like playing this ________ because pro played him herp derp
and level 30 takes what? 150 games?


all I know is it would take me a long-ass time to unlock 100 champions, and that I'm nowhere near 1000 PvP wins. At my current rate, I've just hit Level 30 but wouldn't be able to start playing Ranked for another two years.
---
Now Playing: BL2, TF2, LoL
i5-3570k | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1600MHz RAM | EVGA GeForce GTX670 FTW | Asus P8Z77-V LK | Western Digital 7200RPM 1TB HDD
#7DrewdadruidPosted 4/21/2013 7:13:21 AM
From: saint35 | #005
Sure give me the Riot Points to unlock 100 Champions.

I think he means utilizing the free weeks and winning games with them to learn all the champs
---
http://elohell.net/images/chill/44cfd21be802936535d172d0e98d782f.gif
http://i.imgur.com/aBtgt.jpg LOLIGN: DrewDaDruid
#8Camel-RiderPosted 4/21/2013 7:15:03 AM
From: dennis941012 | #004
why not? I expect people to know counter,build, and synergy with every single champion
not oh I feel like playing this ________ because pro played him herp derp
and level 30 takes what? 150 games?


How about winning 10-15 games with a champ unlocks them for u to use in ranked.
---
LoL IGN: The Camel Rider
#9VascelaPosted 4/21/2013 7:25:09 AM
I have over 1000 wins and I'm bad at this game.

Time doesn't correlate with skill; it's just knowledge of the game. I don't think I've improved that much from 750 to 1000 or 500 to 750 even.
#10Viewtiful_JonPosted 4/21/2013 7:25:25 AM
Or they can just have a ranking system, so the people with lower game knowledge or skill will be against each other whilst the better players would get ranked higher and play each other. That way everyone could play ranked and the good players would get a better rating and not have to worry about the ones who still need to work on their game.