Explain this insult to me.

#1sesshomaru_55Posted 5/4/2013 12:05:04 AM
"maybe if u new how 2 play this game u wudnt be such a nerd."


Wouldn't I NOT be a nerd if I didn't know how to play the game?
---
PSN - Tack06
Gamertag - Tack06
#2zeppelin312Posted 5/4/2013 12:07:47 AM
cya nerd
#3aHappySackaPosted 5/4/2013 12:10:44 AM
zeppelin312 posted...
cya nerd

---
You are now blinking and breathing manually.
http://i.imgur.com/j8p5fA8.png
#4Lord_WoobiePosted 5/4/2013 12:11:11 AM
Let us analyze this from a logical standpoint.

From "maybe if u new how 2 play this game u wudnt be such a nerd." we get the following premise/conclusion diagram:

Know how to play --> Not nerd.

From this we can derive its converse:

Nerd --> Not know how to play.

You, however, assert the following:

"Wouldn't I NOT be a nerd if I didn't know how to play the game?"

From which we can diagram:

Not know how to play --> Not Nerd

And its converse:

Nerd --> Know how to play.

As we can see, the two of you have entirely different criteria for what constitutes being a nerd. If we accept both, the statement is entirely unfalsifiable, so that's a no-go. The only conclusion I can perceive is that the two of you live in entirely different planes of existence with universal laws that are polar opposites of eachother.

Don't touch each other. You might explode like so much matter-antimatter.
---
On the field of honor, the gods bearing witness to my glory, I will pull your entrails through your eyes and use them as reins to ride your soul to hades below!
#5g-cube_mastaPosted 5/4/2013 12:26:49 AM
From: Lord_Woobie | #004
Let us analyze this from a logical standpoint.

From "maybe if u new how 2 play this game u wudnt be such a nerd." we get the following premise/conclusion diagram:

Know how to play --> Not nerd.

From this we can derive its converse:

Nerd --> Not know how to play.

You, however, assert the following:

"Wouldn't I NOT be a nerd if I didn't know how to play the game?"

From which we can diagram:

Not know how to play --> Not Nerd

And its converse:

Nerd --> Know how to play.

As we can see, the two of you have entirely different criteria for what constitutes being a nerd. If we accept both, the statement is entirely unfalsifiable, so that's a no-go. The only conclusion I can perceive is that the two of you live in entirely different planes of existence with universal laws that are polar opposites of eachother.

Don't touch each other. You might explode like so much matter-antimatter.


I hereby declare you as Vice-President of Science.
---
~GameFAQs LoL Board President~
http://i.imgur.com/6rO0g.png
#6iCuriousPosted 5/4/2013 12:29:11 AM
Lord_Woobie posted...
Let us analyze this from a logical standpoint.

From "maybe if u new how 2 play this game u wudnt be such a nerd." we get the following premise/conclusion diagram:

Know how to play --> Not nerd.

From this we can derive its converse:

Nerd --> Not know how to play.

You, however, assert the following:

"Wouldn't I NOT be a nerd if I didn't know how to play the game?"

From which we can diagram:

Not know how to play --> Not Nerd

And its converse:

Nerd --> Know how to play.

As we can see, the two of you have entirely different criteria for what constitutes being a nerd. If we accept both, the statement is entirely unfalsifiable, so that's a no-go. The only conclusion I can perceive is that the two of you live in entirely different planes of existence with universal laws that are polar opposites of eachother.

Don't touch each other. You might explode like so much matter-antimatter.


Brilliant. I would have never figured that out it's so complex.
---
? ? ?
#7natchu96Posted 5/4/2013 12:41:54 AM
To min-max everything for absolute extreme efficiency in both strategic games like this and stuff like Pokemon, being a nerd is sort of required. I have nothing against that.
---
"Luna, I'm afraid he's right. You can't go around calling people that, even if in this case it appears to be the truth." - Sena
#8RiliyksPosted 5/4/2013 12:47:55 AM
sesshomaru_55 posted...
"maybe if u new how 2 play this game u wudnt be such a nerd."


Wouldn't I NOT be a nerd if I didn't know how to play the game?


"Maybe if" implies there is a possibility.

"u" is a letter in the alphabet.

"new" is the opposite of old.

"how 2 play" I'm not sure, but I think this means 2 player mode.

"this game" The game in question, I'm assuming it's League.

"u" again, referring to the letter.

"wudnt" Not sure what this is, someone wanna explain it?

"be such a nerd" This part makes me think that being a nerd is a bad thing.

So there is a possibility that if the letter u wasn't old, it could discover the two player mode to League, and by doing so, the letter u I'm guessing wouldn't be such a nerd.

But if I'm not mistaken, being a nerd requires being smart. So if the letter u was smart enough to find this hidden two player mode in League... would that in fact make it a nerd? Unless nerd is being used in the opposite, implying that nerds are not smart.

I'm fairly sure this is just an idiot expressing his rage using his barely passing understanding of English.
---
Pkmn Diamond FC 2964-5171-5195
Gameplay>Graphics Typos hapen.
#9MoliviousPosted 5/4/2013 12:48:30 AM
you can replace nerd for almost anything insulting... dbag, nerd, momma's boy, etc.

Trashtalking101. You don't need logic, just a word to complete the insult.
---
Surprise! It's me again! \('o ' \ )
"You could easily teach yourself if you observe the world closely." - Elise
#10Pawkie07Posted 5/4/2013 12:59:54 AM
aHappySacka posted...
zeppelin312 posted...
cya nerd