Max W or E as Nami?

#1SnackMachinePosted 7/5/2013 7:43:25 PM
I was thinking maxing E + going ham during a Q would wreck the enemy lane.

Or should I just stick to maxing W?
#2wantfastcarsPosted 7/5/2013 7:45:01 PM
I find W gives better trades if you can land at least one bounce (i.e. ally > bounce to enemy) consistently.
Now Playing: BL2, TF2, LoL
i5-3570k | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1600MHz RAM | EVGA GeForce GTX670 FTW | Asus P8Z77-V LK | Western Digital 7200RPM 1TB HDD
#3KaliphearPosted 7/5/2013 7:46:33 PM
I've tried both, and found that E is more likely to win you trades. In addition, purposely leaving W at low rank for a little gives you a low-cost semi-spammable heal for in lane, which is nice.
#4FlameLord23Posted 7/5/2013 7:51:52 PM
E is better for trading. If you have to sustain W is better if you're playing a safe lane.
All these League girls... Where my B-words with B-cups? SAVE SONA
LoL IGN: I Rock Ths (Also my steam)
#5Khaos XeroPosted 7/5/2013 7:55:54 PM
E is better in my opinion because it increases slow and gives you mixed damage. Also makes your extended trades just better. W costs a lot of mana at max and is somewhat inconsistent.
Playing: Devil Survivor Overclocked [3DS], Devil Survivor 2 [DS]
#6fuzzyslippers2Posted 7/5/2013 7:57:04 PM
E = balls deep son

W = playing scurred
#7ZedPowerPosted 7/5/2013 8:16:07 PM
I level E first, unless I'm getting fed real hard and can afford a Chalice + Manipulator early, in which case I start ranking W.

If my jungler doesn't have much/any CC, then I keep ranking up E anyway because the slow is important.
"ˇViva La Revolución!"
-Salvador Limones