not that the ranking system is bad in any way, its just confusing. like how am i supposed to know how high up the "golden-pyramid-spikey-eyeball" rank is compared to another guy who has the "hollow-golden-pyramid" rank? like they should at least add a name to go along with the rank or something.
#2Brownprouder23Posted 10/18/2010 9:10:57 PM
I've made a topic about this before. Not only are names an issue here, but also the amount of experience needed to feel any progression.
#3CHAINMAILLEKIDPosted 10/18/2010 9:17:40 PM
I caught on pretty quick. I kinda like the aspect of it not having complete certainty.
They should make the top ranks RIDICULOUSLY high, so players never really know if they're at the top yet.
Its always cool to see a rank you've never seen before, then realizing you're about to be in a world of hurt.
#4Brownprouder23Posted 10/18/2010 9:31:15 PM
Sorry that I'm referring to CoD here, but I do remember that getting to highest level didn't take THAT long. It also felt more rewarding since it progressed much more noticeably. It did take a long time to get to 10th prestige.