Do you think IGN will score this game higher than GoldenEye Wii?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Conduit 2
  3. Do you think IGN will score this game higher than GoldenEye Wii?
5 years ago#1
I'd say 9.5.
PKMN Pearl - 2664 0071 4862
Goldeneye Wii: 2626-8957-8168 Name: MMK
5 years ago#2
Only Craig Harris (iirc) would have scored C2 with a 9, I dont think they will rate it above the 8s considering the backlash of the first game (that they promoted)
5 years ago#3
Probably not.
5 years ago#4
not that i don't think this won't be a great game...i agree w/ poster above....i'd wager a 8...maybe and 8.5.....but their not going to make the same mistake they made before
5 years ago#5
I'm saying they'll give it a 7.5.
Hey, my name is Tasi. You may address me as such if you wish. =]
WaW Wii FC: 4641 6749 4296 BANZAAAIII
5 years ago#6
probably an 8
-
PUNCHOUT1116 - eagerly awaiting: mortal kombat, and conduit 2. wwe allstars rocks :D
5 years ago#7
I doubt it will get above an eight. But if the multiplayer works this time then it will be that much better for us as fans then The Conduit 1.
Not changing this sig until Jamarcus Russell wins a Superbowl Started 9/15/07 http://blog.synthesis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dog.jpg
5 years ago#8

I say an 8-8.5 lowest being 7.5 highest being a 9.0

But knowing IGN, they're reviews are just unreliable and in most cases bias when i comes to Wii. And them being CoD fanboys, they probably will be bias.

5 years ago#9
Bet you anything, IGN is gonna be the only one that'll have a decent and detailed review of the multiplayer. INSTEAD OF JUST MENTIONING IT.
Sparkster returns after 16 years in..... "Rocket Knight"
My Alias for Wii Online = "Shader" Monster Hunter Tri = "Deimos"
5 years ago#10

^true.

  1. Boards
  2. Conduit 2
  3. Do you think IGN will score this game higher than GoldenEye Wii?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived