The Reviews aren't looking good, and I've seen some people stand up and say this game isn't that gad and the User Reviews are positive.
Is there anybody who can give insight into where these reviews are coming from?
Is there validity and do you agree or disagree?
#2dacheatcodePosted 4/19/2011 2:26:10 PM
negative --- If that thing is a Big Book, HE MUST BE A ****IN' GIANT! Run! ~Penn and Teller
#3ChangliniPosted 4/19/2011 2:45:37 PM
Well, this game is the sequel to a game that had a lot of hype which destroyed the said game in the eyes of people. Even though this one seems as a huge improvement, there is bound to be some revenge feelings within people who disliked the first game. --- NER , Oh how you haunt me. The server El Nido is called El Nino or El Ninorino in my book
#4namVVoaPosted 4/19/2011 2:47:02 PM
There were no revenge feelings from IGN who rated TC a 8.5/10 but rated C2 7.5/10. LOL
#5ChangliniPosted 4/19/2011 2:49:50 PM(edited)
Actually, I think the scores between 7 and 8 are pretty decent and spot on. --- NER , Oh how you haunt me. The server El Nido is called El Nino or El Ninorino in my book
#6AZN_FLiPSTAHPosted 4/19/2011 2:52:14 PM
And they gave black ops a higher score which was really inferior to c2. --- ^FOR YOUR VIDEOGAMING NEWS^ http://www.leakybattery.com/ MH3 - Sir Nico (49W5EB)
#7namVVoaPosted 4/19/2011 2:53:15 PM
No, they didn't. BO and C2 both received the same score of 7.5/10 from IGN.
#8psychobrewPosted 4/19/2011 4:11:57 PM
What did they give Goldeneye?
#9dacheatcodePosted 4/19/2011 4:13:04 PM
LOL --- If that thing is a Big Book, HE MUST BE A ****IN' GIANT! Run! ~Penn and Teller
#10ddd87Posted 4/19/2011 4:31:21 PM
"Professional" reviews focus on single player, since most of them just play one or two online matches