Square needs to remake classic FFs like VI

#1PhilBrooks_Posted 11/13/2012 10:40:30 AM
With the FF IV like treatment. It would be nice if it came with the original as well.

p.s. anyone know where I can buy FF VI Advance? I have it for ps1 but I want to play the superior version.
---
http://i.imgur.com/C57Xo.gif
http://i.imgur.com/2XkQc.gif
#2emagdnEPosted 11/13/2012 10:44:20 AM
nah

they need to release FF4 for 3DS and Vita

they need to release FF4 so many times that it becomes self parody, Square Enix showing a sense of humor would be the first positive thing either company has ever done
---
Note to self: Cannon highly effective against flesh. -Mimiron
#3rahxephon122Posted 11/13/2012 10:50:58 AM
Why do FF fans want every FF game to be ported over to every single console?
---
Ich habe keinen Meister bis auf den Wind der Freiheit!
#4arclouks_xPosted 11/13/2012 10:53:37 AM
rahxephon122 posted...
Why do FF fans want every FF game to be ported over to every single console?


Yeah I dont know why we are so obsessed with that but they're always day 1 purchases.
---
PS3: arclouksx. -Currently playing:Nothing at all.
http://rebelallianceclan.com/signatures/RAarclouksx.png
#5Freelance_WolfPosted 11/13/2012 10:55:37 AM
After what they did with FFIII and IV (on DS), I wouldn't want them to touch FFVI at all. It's good just as it is. If they redo it like PSP FFIV, then I'm fine with that.
---
Max: "I think he just needs a hug, or a sharp blow to the head."
#6kopo007Posted 11/13/2012 11:05:54 AM
Freelance_Wolf posted...
After what they did with FFIII and IV (on DS), I wouldn't want them to touch FFVI at all. It's good just as it is. If they redo it like PSP FFIV, then I'm fine with that.


So basically, a 3D remake is worst than a ported game that added a few movies???
#7Argh4430Posted 11/13/2012 12:52:48 PM
kopo007 posted...
Freelance_Wolf posted...
After what they did with FFIII and IV (on DS), I wouldn't want them to touch FFVI at all. It's good just as it is. If they redo it like PSP FFIV, then I'm fine with that.


So basically, a 3D remake is worst than a ported game that added a few movies???


Yes, because the 3D remake mucks up some aspect of the gameplay during its transition to 3D. FF3 only had 3 enemies to fight at once (with one exception), so the enemies were made harder. FF4 introduced augments, but barely explained how to get more effectively. They also made it harder. And the 3D models in both games look nice, but not nearly as beuatiful as the 2D games, especially enemy-wise. The few movies were just icing in those ports (I could do without the loading times).
#8kamikaze135Posted 11/13/2012 12:54:31 PM
kopo007 posted...
Freelance_Wolf posted...
After what they did with FFIII and IV (on DS), I wouldn't want them to touch FFVI at all. It's good just as it is. If they redo it like PSP FFIV, then I'm fine with that.


So basically, a 3D remake is worst than a ported game that added a few movies???


FFIV on PSP was a remake. Not a port.
---
This is your life, and it's ending one minute at a time -Tyler Durden
#9DeathSoul2000Posted 11/13/2012 1:06:06 PM
kamikaze135 posted...
kopo007 posted...
Freelance_Wolf posted...
After what they did with FFIII and IV (on DS), I wouldn't want them to touch FFVI at all. It's good just as it is. If they redo it like PSP FFIV, then I'm fine with that.


So basically, a 3D remake is worst than a ported game that added a few movies???


FFIV on PSP was a remake. Not a port.


it was a port of ffiv advance + wiiware after years. its a port.
#10LunarRoarPosted 11/13/2012 2:07:25 PM(edited)
Agreed, I've been dying for a remake/port of FF6 since the GBA version is hard as balls to find these days.
---
http://backloggery.com/main.php?user=lunarroar
Official Grand Master Assassin of New York (Assassin's Creed 3 board)