Just started paper mario sticker star
And I like it. The graphics are fantastic, and the 3d is the best I've seen on 3ds. I've played super paper mario, but none of the others.
What's your thoughts on it? What's so bad about it, if you do hate it?
Everyone subscribe to pure Nintendo magazine! It rocks!
Just gonna sit back, drink some water, and listen to Metroid escape themes to see how this escalates.
I was happy that they brought turn-based battles, but it could be better if it has a good story and EXP. It's what the series is all about, right?
If i'm lying, then i am telling the truth... and i'm not so peace out! [-_-] V
I adore the game.
The wind... it is... blowing... -Ganondorf
1) There is too big of a power difference between battle stickers and Thing stickers when it comes to bosses. It's okay to make bosses have weaknesses, but not to the point that it almost completely negates anything outside of infinijumps, especially when the game expects the player to have flung specific Things into stickers ahead of time. From there it becomes an issue of knowing when to use the specific thing stickers on top of already having them (i.e. the sponge right before the poison spit). Yes, you can get specific hints from Kersti about the boss...after you die. In fact, needing to fling Things into stickers in the first place ends up hindering the entire mechanic in the first place, as cute as the dev team may have thought it was. This might be alleviated a bit if the game treated Things as permanent objects you retained in your inventory that simply required "Thing Points" (TP) to use.
2) 50% of the Thing stickers don't get used outside of contributing them to the museum. By the time you have enough sticker pages to justify carrying around multiple giant Thing stickers, the game is almost over, at which point you have also been taught to be punished for using any Thing that isn't the "right" Thing.
3) Many segments of game progression are locked behind invisible blocks and narrow passages in the background of the screen. It's okay to hide extra, fun goodies and secrets to games. It's not okay to hide game progression behind those things. It's a puzzle to decipher hieroglyphics in a temple. It's not a puzzle to jump at a specific spot (and this is outside of the invis blocks that have flowers underneath them as a clue) or walk behind a random bush that otherwise looks flat, even with 3D on. Imagine if you couldn't clear the original Super Mario Bros without knowing where the invisible 1-Up mushroom was on stage 1-1.
4) There is no meaningful reward for combat; therefore, there is no reason to get into combat. Prior to world 4, the amount of coins you get for defeating an enemy is negligible, especially when stickers are so abundant that the only thing you need to use coins on is black market Things and secret doors. The one saving grace of game design in this aspect is that battles aren't forced.
The only real point where the game hit it's stride was World 4; specifically, the Enigmansion. The puzzles had context, (fire) battle stickers were on par with Things in boss combat, and progression flowed extremely well.
Anyway, just wanted to get this out there, regardless of whether or not you agree with any of the points brought up. It's okay to defend a game, but it's frustrating to see a game being defended over the wrong reasons.
And, again, none of these things are game-breaking, they are just poor game design choices that could have easily been alleviated by a few tweaks to gameplay.
Sticker Star felt like it was too afraid of being an RPG, but when it drifted towards being a point and click puzzle adventure game, it didn't drift far enough and the final result was some hybrid that didn't incorporate proper game mechanics from EITHER genre.
I really like the game. Still have to beat it, though. I'm in World 5.
3DS FC: 3609-1047-7032
Steam / PSN / NNID: Marlouchu
A lot of awkward, tedious, and logic-defying game design decisions could have easily been remedied in an otherwise great Not-RPG/Not-Point-And-Click adventure game.
I was happy that they brought turn-based battles, but it could be better if it has a good story and EXP.
Not to mention Kersti is useless and Mario no longer has partners to assist in the field and/or battle.
1 - Bosses strategies are really stupid
2 - Zero customization
3 - No badges
4 - No partners
5 - The "action commands" you can perform with stickers are too simplified, bland, with next to no variance
6 - Kersti is more annoying than Starlow
7 - No levelling and nothing decent replacing it which in turn brings us to number 7
8 - Battles become pointless fast, because you don't need more coins and you want to save stickers for the important battles
Those are my problems with the game. A better story would have been nice, but it's not a factor that makes me hate a Mario RPG.
you reeeeeaalllly need to play the first 2 games. Both of em are amazing. SPM, and mainly sticker star, are too different imo, but are good in their own way
HG: 1893 9608 1980
Black 2: 4771 6528 6519