Super Mario 3D Land is too short

#51FishbulbPosted 5/22/2013 7:00:02 AM
TheFantasticMrS posted...
MBBDarigon posted...
Did you complete it?


No. I've given up out of disappointment. No game should ever be this short.


How do you know how short it is if you haven't completed it?

Ahhh... I'm getting sucked into a troll vortexxxxx.....
---
Broadcasting your religious faith in a sig is obnoxious. All who agree copy/paste this sig.
#52kaliskonigPosted 5/22/2013 7:24:38 AM
I thought so to until I got the special wolds after beating the main game. The length is great imo if you include the post game.
#53sevenmaggPosted 5/22/2013 7:57:35 AM
The original super Mario bros took one hour to beat and it cost more.Be grateful.
#542wingedangelPosted 5/22/2013 8:09:22 AM
SMASHKING84 posted...
honestly i agree with it being to short.
you should have to 100% a game to judge it.
once the credits roll you have no more obligation to play the game.


You contradicted yourself... in the same post...
---
Lover of all things cute and pretty. <3
Black 2 FC: 4213-1800-0462
#55nintendoman562Posted 5/22/2013 8:10:45 AM
WestbrickVII posted...
You realize there are sixteen worlds, right? And a short game that's done well is better than a long game full of padding and repetition.


This is a short game filled with padding and repetition though.
#56ceedofevilPosted 5/22/2013 8:13:20 AM
2wingedangel posted...
SMASHKING84 posted...
honestly i agree with it being to short.
you should have to 100% a game to judge it.
once the credits roll you have no more obligation to play the game.


You contradicted yourself... in the same post...


That's often the case...
---
Who would win in a fight? Lemmy or God?
#57SMASHKING84Posted 5/22/2013 8:17:09 AM
2wingedangel posted...
SMASHKING84 posted...
honestly i agree with it being to short.
you should have to 100% a game to judge it.
once the credits roll you have no more obligation to play the game.


You contradicted yourself... in the same post...


someone needs to learn what a typo is
---
Gamefaqs where Innovation is more important then quality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TuOa40N7hw
#58GoIrish80Posted 5/22/2013 8:25:04 AM
It's definitely a short game, and people really need to stop using the "Did you 100% it?" logic when it comes to how long a game is.

This whole 100% completion thing is just a way that developers have created to artificially lengthen the game. You got all 3 coins in every level? Who the **** cares? It doesn't change anything in terms of enjoyment of the game and getting through it.

If I can beat Arkham City in 8 hours, I really don't give a crap if it would take me 20 to go back through and find every stupid riddler trophy/etc that's hidden in the city. Easter Egg hunts are for little kids.
---
i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz | 16GB DDR3 | Nvidia 670 2GB SLI | 1TB HD x2
#59LinkSSJ6Posted 5/22/2013 8:30:03 AM
Complains game is too short but didn't even beat it to check if it really is that short? LOL

For anyone else, it's your own fault for playing obsessively. 17 hours isn't short at all.
---
Got a Wii or Wii U but nothing new to play? Get Pandora's Tower!
http://www.pandorastowerwii.com/
#60SMASHKING84Posted 5/22/2013 8:32:49 AM
LinkSSJ6 posted...
Complains game is too short but didn't even beat it to check if it really is that short? LOL

For anyone else, it's your own fault for playing obsessively. 17 hours isn't short at all.


17 hours is a lie. i beat the game in less the 5 hours unless you suck at the game it doesn't last 17 hours.
i know for a fact people 100%ed it in less then 10 hours
---
Gamefaqs where Innovation is more important then quality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TuOa40N7hw