The graphics (of the screenshots) are equivalent to a psp game

#1fpsfanboy1Posted 7/22/2010 5:02:01 PM

just saying

#2urbzsimsPosted 7/22/2010 6:08:43 PM
You're kinda right, but it's not gonna stop me from buying the game
Currently playing: Final Fantasy XIII (PS3), SMG2 (Wii)
Waiting for: MvC3 and Goldeneye 007 (Wii)
#3GoldenEye2010Posted 7/22/2010 6:18:28 PM

shut up about the graphics they're fine

#4TMW001Posted 7/23/2010 5:55:09 AM
Can you tell the diffrents between what object is which then your fine topic ended!* bangs gavel*
#5RECON64bitPosted 7/23/2010 8:47:43 AM

You're right, and this is inexcusable. Why is it that Gamecube's rogue looks better than this game? Why is it that so many Wii games not made by Nintendo look like crap? Does the GCN have better graphical abilities in some way or something?

#6SpackDaDevilManPosted 7/23/2010 11:56:51 AM
f-zero gx cutscene graphics>>>> all things that exist
#7Roger_Rabbit_IVPosted 7/23/2010 1:18:49 PM

Eh, it looks better in motion. Besides, it's still in development so they can improve on the graphics and other issues. It looks really good to me, I don't know what you're talking about. The faces are "meh", but the rest is good.

#8Raiko101Posted 7/23/2010 1:22:26 PM
I wouldn't expect an overhaul in the graphics department before release. You have to consider how many objects they've built for the game since development started. It would take a long time to go back and improve on those models and textures. Not that it matters anyway, because the graphics look fine. Technically far better than any PSP game i've ever seen.
#9DarkZV2BetaPosted 7/23/2010 8:02:16 PM
Iono. I've seen some pretty good looking PSP games compared to this.
2% of GameFAQs users have this in their signature. If you're one of the 98% that doesn't, copy and paste this into your signature.
#10Raiko101Posted 7/23/2010 8:54:40 PM
But they run on a far smaller screen with smaller texture resolutions. Maybe if you squinted, things will look comparable.