Personally i think it's more a case that jrpg's have been so bad for so long now,
that when a half decent one does appear people jump on it like it's the second coming.
And someone mentioned nisa?
When i see something with their name on the front the first thing that comes to my mind is,
"oh great, another rpg full of underage looking girls flashing their pants"
The only way I can see someone not being happy with this gen of JRPGs is if he/she is only on the PS3.
That, or people must've missed a good amount of great handheld JRPGs and some great console RPGs even (Xenoblade, TLS, Lost Odyssey, any Tales this gen really, VC...).
Currently playing: Earthbound, Radiant Historia.
MetalKeiya posted...Fire Emblem's a JRPG. Well, it's a Strategy JRPG. If FE isn't a JRPG, then Disgaea isn't as well.
Really? You found these 2 mediocre?..
Pokemon Black 2 FC: 0605-4074-6062
Fire Emblem is a SJRPG, where's the doubt?
Strategy Japanese Role-playing Game.
Virtue777 posted...MetalKeiya posted...Fire Emblem's a JRPG. Well, it's a Strategy JRPG. If FE isn't a JRPG, then Disgaea isn't as well.
Yep. Tales of Graces f brings nothing to the table, but takes the series multiple steps back. The story is cliche, the battle system cumbersome, the world uninspired, and the soundtrack repetitive and subpar. Tales of Vesperia is a bit better, but I feel like the pacing is a bit off, the battle system repetitive (and overall just dull, brings hardly anything new to the series, at least Tales of Graces f tried something different), the postgame is horrendous, and the antagonist is entirely forgettable.
Coolest guy/gal on the planet: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/user.php?=2426382