The next GameFAQs contest is here! Sign in and enter a Best Year in Gaming bracket for a chance at a \$1000 grand prize!

## How much do you think the firebolt cost?

• Topic Archived
1. Boards
2. Harry Potter
3. How much do you think the firebolt cost?

#### User Info: razid

razid
5 years ago#1
Ok to minimize random guessing, lets put things into context.

1 galleon = 1 galleon
17 sickles in a galleon => 1 sickle = 0.059 galleons
29 knuts in a sickle => 1 knut = 0.0020 galleons

Silver unicorn horns = 21 galleons each
Wand = 7 galleons
Weasley vault in Gringotts = 1 galleon and some sickles
Fred and George life savings = 37 Galleons, 15 Sickles, 3 Knuts = 37.891 galleons
Triwizard Cup winnings = 1000 galleons
Omnoculars at a bargain = 10 galleons each

Harry said something along the lines of "Dumbledore won't spend hundreds of galleons on me" when they were discussing the firebolt

So we know it costs at least 200 galleons, and I'm willing to say it will cost less than 1000 galleons because it will probably be less than the prize money won from the Triwizard Cup, as that's a pretty big deal.

Now 200 to 1000 is a pretty big range. Let's consider these omnoculars. Harry bought 3 of them, which means he had 30 galleons at the time at the Quidditch World Cup. So it seems like 30 galleons is a reasonable amount to have for Harry at any given moment. Unless of course he took some more money than usual, as it is the World Cup, which is quite possible. Harry also told Ron and Hermione not to expect Christmas gifts for "ten years" when he bought them. I'm sure he was exaggerating, but it still goes to say, it seems that 10 galleons is quite a lot to spend.

Based on this, I'm going to say that the firebolt is at least less than 500 galleons. I'm venturing to say that it is somewhere in the 200 to 300 galleon range.
Even a smile is charity

#### User Info: Falling Down

Falling Down
5 years ago#2
I am gonna guess about 350 gal. As Irish bought the whole team 1 I doubt they can cost toooo much.
DOOD!!! ~Prinnies

#### User Info: bakkahentai8600

bakkahentai8600
5 years ago#3
It had a price on demand which is usually wicked expensive. The problem is that we don't know how much a galleon is to a pound.

I would guess somewhere around 800 to 900 though. Those things were so expensive that it cost more than a full team's worth of Nimbus Two Thousand and Ones, and so expensive that even Lucius wouldn't buy Draco one.

However, they WERE cheap enough that Harry believed he could buy one (even if it might empty out his vault).
Previously the_sage2600
I'm baaaacccckkkkk

#### User Info: Rasmoh

Rasmoh
5 years ago#4
Actually, we do know the cash value of a Galleon. Approximately \$7.35 USD.

It must have cost thousands of galleons though, because even costing 1000 galleons would only make it cost \$7350, which I highly doubt is enough to clear out Harry's vault.
I won't say a thing, because the one who knows best is you.
Miami Dolphins 6-10 Another decade of mediocrity!

#### User Info: nobleisthyname

nobleisthyname
5 years ago#5

From: Rasmoh | #004
Actually, we do know the cash value of a Galleon. Approximately \$7.35 USD.

It must have cost thousands of galleons though, because even costing 1000 galleons would only make it cost \$7350, which I highly doubt is enough to clear out Harry's vault.

The Weasley's had about \$8.00 in their bank vault? Seems kinda pointless.
i5 2500k@4.3GHz | Intel Z68 Gigabyte | GTX 560 TI | 4GB DDR3 G.SKILL Ripjaws | Corsair HX650w | Lancool PC-K62 | Dell U2211H

#### User Info: Sephy999

Sephy999
5 years ago#6
A Galleon is £5. In dollars it's whatever £5 is at the time, which has been already stated. The economy the wizarding world isn't as developed as the muggle one and inflation is no where near as high.
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh90/Psynosis/image0017.gif

#### User Info: nobleisthyname

nobleisthyname
5 years ago#7

From: Sephy999 | #006
A Galleon is £5. In dollars it's whatever £5 is at the time, which has been already stated. The economy the wizarding world isn't as developed as the muggle one and inflation is no where near as high.

Then a galleon should be worth much more than \$8.00.
i5 2500k@4.3GHz | Intel Z68 Gigabyte | GTX 560 TI | 4GB DDR3 G.SKILL Ripjaws | Corsair HX650w | Lancool PC-K62 | Dell U2211H

#### User Info: Sephy999

Sephy999
5 years ago#8
Maybe I phrased it wrong. Salaries in the wizarding world would be far less than the muggle one hence a galleon would be worth a lot more than the relative £5/\$8 in the muggle world. It makes Fred and George's life savings less than \$300 which wouldn't buy you much in the muggle world but in the wizarding world it'd be a fairly decent amount.

Fred and George opened up a shop with the money Harry gave them from the Triwizard Tournament, \$8000.
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh90/Psynosis/image0017.gif

#### User Info: Clipper

Clipper
5 years ago#9
Yes, but in fairness, Fred and George already had a lot of their stuff invented when Harry gave them that money. Who knows how much of it they actually would've needed, or how much money they made at Hogwarts from selling stuff in OotP. I mean remember, they did have 26 galleons in one night.
Claude Julien needs to be fired even if the Bruins win the Stanley Cup - acr after Bruins losing game 4 of the ECF against the Tampa Bay Lightning

#### User Info: Lahar

Lahar
5 years ago#10
How thought out is wizarding currency to begin with? Did JKR actually work it out mathematically? Or is it more random, good-sounding numbers like with the student population and the Weasley bros. ages?
.
cutting.
1. Boards
2. Harry Potter
3. How much do you think the firebolt cost?