This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Here, now you guys never need to post an abortion topic again.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Here, now you guys never need to post an abortion topic again.

User Info: Iamvegito

Iamvegito
2 years ago#1
http://fightforsense.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/manyargs/

A list of every single anti-choice argument ever and why they are all horse-s***.

It's a long page, but worth reading. Abortion debate is over for the rational.
"It is no good hammering your sword into a plowshare if you must forge it again on the morrow. "

User Info: GeneralFrings

GeneralFrings
2 years ago#2
In point 3 the author admits that the right to life is a human construct but then denies that you can use it's subjective nature to argue that unborn babies have the right to life. The subjectivity surrounding the right to life is at the heart if the entire debate, and his dismissal of this fact is intellectually shallow and dishonest.

Also, it's probably unhealthy to search for pages full of arguments in favor of the position you already hold lol.
How deep is too deep?

User Info: TheRunner PD

TheRunner PD
2 years ago#3
Here's the only one you need.

It's not your body. F*** off.
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
"Why is porn only considered bad when it's revenge porn?" - Tails82

User Info: TheRunner PD

TheRunner PD
2 years ago#4
Like, you really have no idea how morally vacant and downright disgusting you are for posting that, Vegito. You should be ashamed of yourself.

When you can think like an adult and not some base animal-like mouthbreather you can come back to the board.
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
"Why is porn only considered bad when it's revenge porn?" - Tails82

User Info: hunter_gohan

hunter_gohan
2 years ago#5
Wait what, people have used #2 as a serious argument?
The food that stands on his [Odin's] table he gives to two wolves of his called Geri and Freki. He himself needs no food; wine is for him both drink and meat.

User Info: Stakeholder

Stakeholder
2 years ago#6
I don't see anything morally wrong with employing logical arguments. This man doesn't deserve such barbaric ad hominem.

User Info: TheRunner PD

TheRunner PD
2 years ago#7
Stakeholder posted...
I don't see anything morally wrong with employing logical arguments. This man doesn't deserve such barbaric ad hominem.


Good God in heaven. I am so morally superior to you then that it literally pains me. Your level of crassness being in such close proximity is having some horrible dilative effect on my well of righteousness. Please leave.
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
"Why is porn only considered bad when it's revenge porn?" - Tails82

User Info: Jabraham

Jabraham
2 years ago#8
GeneralFrings posted...
In point 3 the author admits that the right to life is a human construct but then denies that you can use it's subjective nature to argue that unborn babies have the right to life. The subjectivity surrounding the right to life is at the heart if the entire debate, and his dismissal of this fact is intellectually shallow and dishonest.

Also, it's probably unhealthy to search for pages full of arguments in favor of the position you already hold lol.


If the right to life is subjective, then it's not a good basis for making laws. You can argue for the right to life for a fetus, but that argument doesn't actually mean anything if people disagree.
I ain't trippin cause the truth is really you don't know me.

User Info: hunter_gohan

hunter_gohan
2 years ago#9
Jabraham posted...
If the right to life is subjective, then it's not a good basis for making laws. You can argue for the right to life for a fetus, but that argument doesn't actually mean anything if people disagree.


But like all laws are. That's exactly what they do, argue the bills, and it doesn't matter if you don't get enough votes.

He's pointing how it's subjective and given by laws and how the laws (in many countries) do not give them to embryos and how simply claiming they have them innately does nothing against that. IoW it doesn't seem like the General finished reading that entry.

"Well then, there is the legal system, which can specifically remove “right to life” from certain humans, most frequently whenever someone is given a death penalty. In the USA and various other nations, that legal system has also found reason to deny right-to-life to unborn humans. Sure, there are many who oppose that denial. But to base that denial on the mere claim that unborn humans automatically have a right to life, that denial is logically flawed, based on bad data."
The food that stands on his [Odin's] table he gives to two wolves of his called Geri and Freki. He himself needs no food; wine is for him both drink and meat.

User Info: Freaux

Freaux
2 years ago#10
TheRunner PD posted...
Like, you really have no idea how morally vacant and downright disgusting you are for posting that, Vegito. You should be ashamed of yourself.

When you can think like an adult and not some base animal-like mouthbreather you can come back to the board.


Can you explain?
PSN: Fre_aux
  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Here, now you guys never need to post an abortion topic again.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived