This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Leftist violence makes university ban Ann Coulter

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Leftist violence makes university ban Ann Coulter

User Info: OkSlowbro

OkSlowbro
5 days ago#121
RyanBraun8 posted...
RcBcoop80 posted...
SPMcGuilicutty posted...
OkSlowbro posted...
I don't get enjoyment out of seeing how extreme and intolerant they've become.

That's because we haven't become extreme or intolerant. We're up against LITERAL NAZIS.

Lmao, this snowflake is getting so triggered right now.

Good for Ann though, it's enough with these leftists violently rioting every time someone with a different view point speaks.

Ironic in a topic full of rightists b****ing, moaning and crying because their heroes couldn't deliver their messages where they wanted. Boo hoo *lip quiver*

If by that you mean "stocking up on popcorn", then sure.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/329839-berkeley-reverses-decision-to-cancel-ann-coulter-speech

User Info: OkSlowbro

OkSlowbro
5 days ago#122
SPMcGuilicutty posted...
OkSlowbro posted...
SPMcGuilicutty posted...
OkSlowbro posted...
And, consistently, you've been more extreme and intolerant than those LITERAL NAZIS.

No, we haven't.

By the way, Madfoot, how many accounts have you gotten banned for being a racist troll, again?

Cool. Show me one time the alt-right disrupted a left-wing event with weapons, after all the attendees got disarmed by cops. I'll wait.

So, your argument is, "liberals don't tolerate Nazis, therefore they are actually more intolerant than the Nazis." Do I have that right?

Also, you didn't answer my question: How many accounts have you gotten banned for being a racist troll?

No, my argument is that the side that attacked a defenseless group of people with weapons are worse than the side that didn't do that.

User Info: IMadepooh4U

IMadepooh4U
5 days ago#123
OkSlowbro posted...
If by that you mean "stocking up on popcorn", then sure.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/329839-berkeley-reverses-decision-to-cancel-ann-coulter-speech


After initially cancelling the author's planned talk over security concerns, the university changed course Thursday after officials say they found an "appropriate, protectable venue."

Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks issued a statement defending the university's "unwavering commitment to the First Amendment of the Constitution."

In the statement, Dirks also confirmed that he instructed university officials to look for a new venue for Coulter after she vowed to come to the school as planned on April 27 and deliver her speech.

"Ms. Coulter’s announcement that she intends to come to this campus on April 27 without regard for the fact that we don’t have a protectable venue available on that date is of grave concern," Dirks wrote. "Fortunately, that expanded search identified an appropriate, protectable venue that is available on the afternoon of May 2."


Seems as though Berkeley isn't used to strong females. She left them no choice lol!

And who does she need protection from? Free speech hating fascists?
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average legressive - Winston Churchill

User Info: WhiskeyDisk

WhiskeyDisk
5 days ago#124
IMadepooh4U posted...
And who does she need protection from? Free speech hating fascists?


bingo.
http://i.imgur.com/4fmtLFt.gif
http://s1.zetaboards.com/sba/ ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap.

User Info: Muhspaceaids

Muhspaceaids
5 days ago#125
Cant wait to see them flip on this again or watch all yhe livestreams when it happens.

Lets see if Berkeley starts cracking down on the terrorists that ANTIFA are or will they leave it up to the attendees to do it like the did saturday.
Only plebs use 10 posts per page

User Info: AtmosOmega

AtmosOmega
5 days ago#126
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Then we're lowering themselves to their level.

When the hell has directly challenging someone's ideas EVER amounted to intellectually "lowering" oneself?

Exposing bad ideas and debunking them in public forum doesn't automatically promote those ideas, nor has it ever been the case. If the mere existence of bad ideas were innately self-sustaining and pernicious we would be so socially dysfunctional that society itself literally couldn't exist.
(in the "One does not have to burn themselves to learn fire is hot." sort of way)

There's a reason flat earth society and fundamentalist Christians are pathetic jokes to the public today, and society didn't have to no-platform them to make that happen.

You do realize the only other alternatives to confronting opposition (however malicious their ideas) are avoidance (which is only a temporary measure at best) and violence/brutality, aka literal oppression and war, right?

Engaging your opponents intellectually is in fact, taking the road that specifically AVOIDS lowering oneself to brutalism. If you cannot grasp that simple fact, then remove yourself from all discussion including this one posthaste, because clearly you either don't place any value in the concept of discourse, or you don't understand its purpose.
If you don't like what a gaming company is trying to force upon you and the market, don't buy that company's games.
Cruel DRM can only flourish if you let it.

User Info: OkSlowbro

OkSlowbro
5 days ago#127
AtmosOmega posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Then we're lowering themselves to their level.

When the hell has directly challenging someone's ideas EVER amounted to intellectually "lowering" oneself?

Exposing bad ideas and debunking them in public forum doesn't automatically promote those ideas, nor has it ever been the case. If the mere existence of bad ideas were innately self-sustaining and pernicious we would be so socially dysfunctional that society itself literally couldn't exist.
(in the "One does not have to burn themselves to learn fire is hot." sort of way)

There's a reason flat earth society and fundamentalist Christians are pathetic jokes to the public today, and society didn't have to no-platform them to make that happen.

You do realize the only other alternatives to confronting opposition (however malicious their ideas) are avoidance (which is only a temporary measure at best) and violence/brutality, aka literal oppression and war, right?

Engaging your opponents intellectually is in fact, taking the road that specifically AVOIDS lowering oneself to brutalism. If you cannot grasp that simple fact, then remove yourself from all discussion including this one posthaste, because clearly you either don't place any value in the concept of discourse, or you don't understand its purpose.

*drops mic*

User Info: IMadepooh4U

IMadepooh4U
5 days ago#128
AtmosOmega posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Then we're lowering themselves to their level.

When the hell has directly challenging someone's ideas EVER amounted to intellectually "lowering" oneself?

Exposing bad ideas and debunking them in public forum doesn't automatically promote those ideas, nor has it ever been the case. If the mere existence of bad ideas were innately self-sustaining and pernicious we would be so socially dysfunctional that society itself literally couldn't exist.
(in the "One does not have to burn themselves to learn fire is hot." sort of way)

There's a reason flat earth society and fundamentalist Christians are pathetic jokes to the public today, and society didn't have to no-platform them to make that happen.

You do realize the only other alternatives to confronting opposition (however malicious their ideas) are avoidance (which is only a temporary measure at best) and violence/brutality, aka literal oppression and war, right?

Engaging your opponents intellectually is in fact, taking the road that specifically AVOIDS lowering oneself to brutalism. If you cannot grasp that simple fact, then remove yourself from all discussion including this one posthaste, because clearly you either don't place any value in the concept of discourse, or you don't understand its purpose.


rek't

And I think you have described BBT fairly well.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average legressive - Winston Churchill

User Info: WhiskeyDisk

WhiskeyDisk
5 days ago#129
IMadepooh4U posted...
AtmosOmega posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Then we're lowering themselves to their level.

When the hell has directly challenging someone's ideas EVER amounted to intellectually "lowering" oneself?

Exposing bad ideas and debunking them in public forum doesn't automatically promote those ideas, nor has it ever been the case. If the mere existence of bad ideas were innately self-sustaining and pernicious we would be so socially dysfunctional that society itself literally couldn't exist.
(in the "One does not have to burn themselves to learn fire is hot." sort of way)

There's a reason flat earth society and fundamentalist Christians are pathetic jokes to the public today, and society didn't have to no-platform them to make that happen.

You do realize the only other alternatives to confronting opposition (however malicious their ideas) are avoidance (which is only a temporary measure at best) and violence/brutality, aka literal oppression and war, right?

Engaging your opponents intellectually is in fact, taking the road that specifically AVOIDS lowering oneself to brutalism. If you cannot grasp that simple fact, then remove yourself from all discussion including this one posthaste, because clearly you either don't place any value in the concept of discourse, or you don't understand its purpose.


rek't

And I think you have described BBT fairly well.


*BOOM*

Headshot

Now where's SPMcGuilicutty?
http://i.imgur.com/4fmtLFt.gif
http://s1.zetaboards.com/sba/ ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap.
Barenziah Boy Toy 5 days ago#130
AtmosOmega posted...
When the hell has directly challenging someone's ideas EVER amounted to intellectually "lowering" oneself?

Those ideas have been debunked for a hundred years. The debate against KKK-ideology has already been settled. There's no point lowering yourself to debate stupidity.
You don't need a treaty to have free trade. M Rothbard
{Self-Hating Token Asian of the Ivory Tower's Zionist Elite}
  1. Boards
  2. Politics
  3. Leftist violence makes university ban Ann Coulter

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived