Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. World of Warcraft
  3. Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash

User Info: Marikhen

Marikhen
4 years ago#31
From: ShadowEdgeX | #026
Cata's main failing was how horribly slow they were releasing content.


I rank the whole thing where Blizzard's total focus on end-game balancing made sub-cap content laughably easy because of the changes 4.0+ made. I had a warrior at around level 25'ish going into Cataclysm and she went from "Wow, this is kind of annoying" to "Wow, I can solo whole freaking dungeons!" My shaman was pretty much in the same boat with my rogue and priest nearly there as well. I mean it's really bad when a healer class/build can solo elite mobs in appropriately-leveled 5-mans with little danger if they don't over-pull.

Chalk it up to personal preference, but I prefer balanced content to more content. /shrugs.
Stop complaining. I could have done this more painfully. - Dryad from Sacred 2.
  1. Boards
  2. World of Warcraft
  3. Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived