You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Nope . He's afraid of getting bashed by one of the two sides if he stated facts and the reality of this game , so he acted all nuetural and left lot of points about the game. Aside from that, he is too casual and mainstream for such technical games . He belongs to shooters and linear RPGs , not technical games with real gameplay.
In short he's got some bias to save himself from losing traffic and credibility as a reviewer, and this genre isn't his field of expertise.
I personally don't trust his reviews that much since he tries to follow the general opinion and rates linear games and shooters really high, while he acts like an expert and all critical about other genres.I used to trust his reviews a bit but I am too paranoid about him now after he started valuing fake replayabilty and linear game mechanics like shooting, more than strategy and technical terms.