Isn't this false advertising?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Ghostbusters: Sanctum of Slime
  3. Isn't this false advertising?

User Info: kvmer

kvmer
5 years ago#1
I realise this must have been said numerous times already, but this game is not at all a sequel to the 2009 Ghostbuster's video game. So why does Sanctum of Slime advertises itself as the sequel?

While Ghostbusters: The Video Game featured all the actors, an original story, and was a true Ghostbusters game, this game is just an extremely poor game with the Ghostbusters license slapped onto it, like the Ghosbusters videogames before the 2009 effort. Nobody who had anything to do with the 2009 videogame, has worked on Sanctum of Slime. I'm pretty sure people like Dan Aykroyd and Bill Murray have no idea of this game's existence.

Ghostbusters: The Video Game is probably the first entertainment product to be released since Ghosbusters 2. This however, has nothing to do with that. And I'm also not counting the cartoons, who also had none of the original actors and writers. The only thing those have in common with the movies are the soundtrack.

User Info: Marvel_Man

Marvel_Man
5 years ago#2
Really can't tell if your serious or not.
My steel has been tainted by the blood of a weakling!
"Goku would win because Gohan is stronger."
  1. Boards
  2. Ghostbusters: Sanctum of Slime
  3. Isn't this false advertising?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived