Terrible port. The framerate is just awful.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Rayman 3D
  3. Terrible port. The framerate is just awful.

User Info: runbleduck

6 years ago#1
Even the n64 version performed better than this. This game has both low unstable framerate and lots of stuttering. Let's not mention the excessive ghosting effect with the 3D turned on. UbiTrash really couldn't care less. Anyone who played the psx version recall if it performed better than this terrible port or not?

User Info: grans

6 years ago#2
You are right, frame rate is unacceptable, especially since the n64 version performed better. Still better than ps1 though. Looks better than ps1 as well. The issue here is that the 3ds is very powerful, more than even dreamcast or ps2. So there's no excuse for the clear lack of effort in this port. In addition to the unstable frame rate, they also removed the dynamic lighting from the dreamcast and even n64 versions.

However, the game is still playable and far better than the ds port.
NEVER judge a game you have not played.

User Info: DJ_Nario

6 years ago#3
Yeah, I'm disappointed that the game doesn't run in 60fps like the Dreamcast version, but at least it's better than the DS version.
Xbox Live Gamertag: DJ Nario
  1. Boards
  2. Rayman 3D
  3. Terrible port. The framerate is just awful.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived