NSMBU confirmed to be bad

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. NSMBU confirmed to be bad

User Info: LordYggdrasilXX

LordYggdrasilXX
4 years ago#31
Another game I will avoid buying then.

User Info: jjg737

jjg737
4 years ago#32
Steve__Burnside posted...
*facepalm

8.2 generally means great. Anything below 5 is considered bad. 5 - 7 is mediocre or average


8.2 means good,9.0+ means great. Either way a review means nothing nowadays, everyone is a critic and if a game doesn't live up to their high expectations they give it a bad rating.

User Info: lizard81288

lizard81288
4 years ago#33
New Super Mario Bros. U

- May look the same, but there are some “incredible tweaks”
- GamesMaster feels it’s easier than NSMB Wii
- Took under seven hours to complete
- More to the game outside of the main campaign
- Most of the innovation is saved for the final levels
- “Without wishing to spoil anything, we were surprised, excited, and twinkly-eyed during an excellent finale. It’s almost as if Nintendo suddenly realised that they were in fact working with a Wii U, with a game-changing GamePad and everything.”
- Hopes Nintendo will “build on this solid, if not mind-blowing, foundation.”
- Graphics: 82%
- Gameplay: 85%
- Accessibility: 90%
- Lifespan: 80%
- Innovation: 75%
- Overall: 82%
- “A great excuse for families to gather round the TV, and an enticing glimpse of Mario’s HD future.”


Whelp....that sucks.
I hate people in general.
http://w11.zetaboards.com/NPC/index/

User Info: TrueBlue91

TrueBlue91
4 years ago#34
jjg737 posted...
Steve__Burnside posted...
*facepalm

8.2 generally means great. Anything below 5 is considered bad. 5 - 7 is mediocre or average


8.2 means good,9.0+ means great.

No, 7 is good, 8 is great, 9+ is amazing. Most reviewers don't use the full 1-10 scale though - a 5/10 game is treated like a 2/10 game should be, when it is merely below average (average being 6)
Pour grammer annoy's me

User Info: indigna7ion

indigna7ion
4 years ago#35
82 means it is good. Honestly as long as NSMBU stays to it's formula then it can never be bad.

User Info: KeyBlade999

KeyBlade999
4 years ago#36
Steve__Burnside posted...
*facepalm

8.2 generally means great. Anything below 5 is considered bad. 5 - 7 is mediocre or average
Every wound a new opportunity, every curse a new challenge.
I shall encounter defeats... But I will not be defeated.

User Info: LHS_2012

LHS_2012
4 years ago#37
TrueBlue91 posted...
jjg737 posted...
Steve__Burnside posted...
*facepalm

8.2 generally means great. Anything below 5 is considered bad. 5 - 7 is mediocre or average


8.2 means good,9.0+ means great.

No, 7 is good, 8 is great, 9+ is amazing. Most reviewers don't use the full 1-10 scale though - a 5/10 game is treated like a 2/10 game should be, when it is merely below average (average being 6)


Average is definitely 7. Most reviewers score like a professor would grade a paper, with 9+ being excellent, 8+ being above average, 7+ being average, 6+ being below average and 5 or below being failing. Reviewers don't use the full ten point scale because games usually aren't that awful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_N_WTiMga4

User Info: AXKSION

AXKSION
4 years ago#38
Well, it isn't called New Super Casual Rehashed Bros for nothing.
The song is called "Baba O' Riley", NOT "Teenage Wasteland".
http://imgon.net/di-CFMD.gif

User Info: SpacedDuck

SpacedDuck
4 years ago#39
This topic has been confirmed bad also. Superman 64 bad.

Keep/Kept the Faith! Forever a member of Red Sox Nation!

User Info: darkqueenhelba

darkqueenhelba
4 years ago#40
LHS_2012 posted...
TrueBlue91 posted...
jjg737 posted...
Steve__Burnside posted...
*facepalm

8.2 generally means great. Anything below 5 is considered bad. 5 - 7 is mediocre or average


8.2 means good,9.0+ means great.

No, 7 is good, 8 is great, 9+ is amazing. Most reviewers don't use the full 1-10 scale though - a 5/10 game is treated like a 2/10 game should be, when it is merely below average (average being 6)


Average is definitely 7. Most reviewers score like a professor would grade a paper, with 9+ being excellent, 8+ being above average, 7+ being average, 6+ being below average and 5 or below being failing. Reviewers don't use the full ten point scale because games usually aren't that awful.


Which makes it foolish to use a scaling system like that. If you're not going to utilize the entire system then you're using something completely inefficient. There's no reason to have over 50% of your own methods be useless.
My response to trolls; GET A JOB!!!
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. NSMBU confirmed to be bad

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived